Mazda Mazda2 vs Suzuki S-Presso

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda Mazda2 in South Africa

Mazda Mazda2

1.5 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol Automatic
ZAR 417,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 85 kW 🔧 148 Nm ⛽ 16.7 km/l
VS
Suzuki S-Presso in South Africa

Suzuki S-Presso

1.0 GL+ AMT S-Edition Petrol Automatic
ZAR 219,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 49 kW 🔧 89 Nm ⛽ 22.7 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Mazda2
Fuel Economy S-Presso
🛡 Safety Mazda2
📦 Practicality S-Presso
🔑 Ownership S-Presso
S-Presso starts ZAR 336000 cheaper Mazda2 from ZAR 336,000 · S-Presso from ZAR 178,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Mazda2 S-Presso
Engine Power 85 kW 49 kW
Torque 148 Nm 89 Nm
Engine Size 1496 cc 998 cc
Claimed Mileage 16.7 km/l 22.7 km/l
Ground Clearance 152 mm 181 mm
Boot / Load Bay 250 l 239 l
Airbags 6 2 front SRS airbags
Kerb Weight 1070 kg 750-770 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 Years/Unlimited km 5 years / 200 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Mazda2 and S-Presso are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Mazda2 +17 pts
Efficiency S-Presso +19 pts
Safety Mazda2 +11 pts
Practicality S-Presso +8 pts
Ownership S-Presso +13 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Mazda2

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

S-Presso

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Mazda2

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

S-Presso

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Mazda2 S-Presso
Model Introduced Year 2015 2021
Generation Current DJ-generation Mazda2, updated for South Africa in 2026 First generation S-Presso on HEARTECT lightweight platform, shared across Suzuki's entry-level range globally; developed specifically for emerging market buyers prioritising fuel economy and low running costs
Facelift History The South African range received a feature and styling update for the 2026 model year. Launched in SA in 2021 as a new nameplate; S-Edition trim added in 2023 with two-tone colour options and additional colour variants; no significant mechanical updates since launch
Facelift Launched Since 2015 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active published
Segment B-segment hatchback Hatchback
Vehicle Type Hatchback Hatchback
Color Note - Sizzling Red, Speedy Blue, Solid White, Metallic Silky Silver, Pearl Midnight Black, Turquoise Blue Pearl (S-Edition), Sizzling Red with Pearl Midnight Black roof (S-Edition two-tone), Speedy Blue with Pearl Midnight Black roof (S-Edition two-tone)
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec Mazda2 S-Presso
Ground Clearance 152 mm 181 mm
Wheelbase 2570 mm 2380 mm
Length 4085 mm 3565 mm
Width 1695 mm 1520 mm
Height 1504 mm 1565 mm
Kerb Weight 1070 kg 750-770 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight 1527 kg 1105 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 250 l 239 l
Towing Capacity 250 kg 0 kg
Turning Radius 4.7 m 4.5 m
Load Bed Length 250 l 239 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom 1063 mm 1000 mm
Rear Legroom 881 mm 875 mm
Front Shoulder Room 1352 mm 1250 mm
Rear Shoulder Room 1273 mm 1205 mm
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload 457 kg 350 kg
Boot Volume 250 l 239 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 44 l 27 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 1527 kg 1105 kg
Ground Clearance Max 152 mm 181 mm
Ground Clearance Min 152 mm 181 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 152 mm 181 mm
Height Mm 1504 mm 1565 mm
Length Mm 4085 mm 3565 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 250 l 239 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg 457 kg 350 kg
Cargo Volume 250 l 239 l
Tare Mass Kg 1070 kg 750-770 kg
Turning Circle 4.7 m 4.5 m
Turning Circle M 4.7 m 4.5 m
Width Mm 1695 mm 1520 mm
Front Track Width - 1280 mm
Rear Track Width - 1280 mm
Front Headroom - 985 mm
Rear Headroom - 975 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded - 315 l
Boot Space Seats Folded - 315 l

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

S-Presso leads by 1 points

Both Mazda2 and S-Presso are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 51 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 94% confidence
51
#1 Winner

S-Presso

94% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 83 Check Performance 21
Performance 21
Efficiency 83
Safety 50
Practicality 53
Ownership 60
Leads by 1 points
50
#2

Mazda2

94% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 64 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 64
Safety 61
Practicality 45
Ownership 47
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Mazda2 +17 Efficiency S-Presso +19 Safety Mazda2 +11 Practicality S-Presso +8 Ownership S-Presso +13

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

S-Presso

Performance 21/100
Efficiency 83/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 53/100
Ownership 60/100

Mazda2

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 64/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 45/100
Ownership 47/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Suzuki S-Presso wins with 51 pts vs 50 pts for Mazda2

In structured scoring, S-Presso emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Mazda2 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the S-Presso edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Mazda2 64 vs S-Presso 83. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Mazda2 61, S-Presso 50. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Mazda2 47, S-Presso 60. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Mazda2 45, S-Presso 53. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Mazda2 38, S-Presso 21. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The S-Presso edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The S-Presso scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Mazda2 and S-Presso in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mazda2 scores 38 vs 21.

Efficiency: Mazda2 scores 64 vs 83.

Safety: Mazda2 scores 61 vs 50.

Practicality: Mazda2 scores 45 vs 53.

Ownership: Mazda2 scores 47 vs 60.

Final structured scoring gives S-Presso the advantage in this comparison.