BMW M3 Sedan vs BMW M4 Convertible

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

BMW M3 Sedan in South Africa

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,190,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 390 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
BMW M4 Convertible in South Africa

BMW M4 Convertible

M4 Competition Convertible AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,330,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 390 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

BMW M3 Sedan vs BMW M4 Convertible: the short answer

M3 Sedan and M4 Convertible are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

M3 Sedan starts ZAR 140,000 cheaper M3 Sedan from ZAR 2,190,000 · M4 Convertible from ZAR 2,330,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification M3 Sedan M4 Convertible
Maximum Power M3 Sedan390 kW M4 Convertible390 kW
Maximum Torque M3 Sedan650 Nm @ 2750-5730 rpm M4 Convertible650 Nm @ 2750-5730 rpm
Engine Size M3 Sedan2993 cc M4 Convertible2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy M3 Sedan12.5 km/l M4 Convertible12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance M3 Sedan140 mm M4 Convertible140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

BMW M3 Sedan

M3 Competition Sedan with M xDrive

Hagalu editorial rating
3.9/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

BMW M4 Convertible

M4 Competition Convertible AWD

Hagalu editorial rating
3.6/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

M3 Sedan

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

M4 Convertible

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

M3 Sedan

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

M4 Convertible

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec M3 Sedan M4 Convertible
Model Introduced Year 2020 2021
Generation G80 four-door BMW M performance sedan, separate from the regular 3 Series range and from the Touring body. G83 full-M soft-top convertible with M xDrive and body-specific roof and luggage packaging.
Facelift History Current G80-generation South African M3 Competition Sedan in all-wheel-drive form. Current updated G83-generation M4 Competition Convertible in the South African AWD configuration.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Convertible
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Premium Sedan Premium Convertible
Vehicle Type Car Car
Spec M3 Sedan M4 Convertible
Length 4801 mm 4801 mm
Width 1903 mm 1887 mm
Height 1438 mm 1399 mm
Wheelbase 2857 mm 2857 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 140 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 l 59 l
Boot/Cargo Space 480 l 385 l
Kerb Weight 1855 kg 2000 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2260 kg 2345 kg
Payload Capacity 480 kg 420 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 985 mm 987 mm
Rear Headroom 952 mm 947 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1036 mm
Rear Legroom 895 mm 890 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This M3 Sedan and M4 Convertible comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: M3 Sedan 100 vs M4 Convertible 97.

Efficiency index: M3 Sedan 47 vs M4 Convertible 47.

Safety-equipment index: M3 Sedan 92 vs M4 Convertible 92.

Practicality index: M3 Sedan 60 vs M4 Convertible 53.

Ownership-cover index: M3 Sedan not separately scored vs M4 Convertible not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

M3 Sedan leads by 3 points

M3 Sedan and M4 Convertible are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 83% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

M3 Sedan

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 100
Efficiency 47
Safety 92
Practicality 60
Leads by 3 points
74
#2

M4 Convertible

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 97 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 97
Efficiency 47
Safety 92
Practicality 53
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance M3 Sedan +3 Efficiency Level Safety Level Practicality M3 Sedan +7

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

M3 Sedan

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 60/100

M4 Convertible

Performance 97/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 53/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW M3 Sedan leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 74 pts for M4 Convertible

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, M3 Sedan leads. However, M4 Convertible may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

M3 Sedan vs M4 Convertible questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.