Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Mahindra Scorpio-N

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
VS
Mahindra Scorpio-N in South Africa

Mahindra Scorpio-N

Z8L 4x4 AT Adventure Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Mahindra Scorpio-N: the short answer

Scorpio-N has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser FJ remains close.

Scorpio-N starts ZAR 224,001 cheaper Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000 · Scorpio-N from ZAR 489,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser FJ Scorpio-N
Maximum Power Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm Scorpio-N128.6 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm Scorpio-N400 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser FJ2700 cc Scorpio-N2184 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser FJ9.3 km/l Scorpio-N14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser FJ245 mm Scorpio-N187 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Scorpio-N

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Scorpio-N

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser FJ Scorpio-N
Model Introduced Year 2026 Not Available
Generation First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026 Current local listing
Facelift History New South African model line launched in 2026 Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since New South African model line launched in 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current South African 2026 specification Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status published Active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1970 kg 1825-2070 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Land Cruiser FJ Scorpio-N
Length 4610 mm 4662 mm
Width 1855 mm 1918 mm
Height 1890 mm 1905 mm
Wheelbase 2580 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 245 mm 187 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l 57 l
Kerb Weight 1970 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2500 kg -
Towing Capacity 2500 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m -
Boot/Cargo Space - 460 l

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser FJ and Scorpio-N comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser FJ 56 vs Scorpio-N 69.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser FJ 38 vs Scorpio-N 60.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser FJ 93 vs Scorpio-N 90.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser FJ 76 vs Scorpio-N 78.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored vs Scorpio-N not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Scorpio-N leads by 8 points

Scorpio-N has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser FJ remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 54% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Scorpio-N

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 69
Efficiency 60
Safety 90
Practicality 78
Leads by 8 points
67
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

58% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 56
Efficiency 38
Safety 93
Practicality 76
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Scorpio-N +13 Efficiency Scorpio-N +22 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +3 Practicality Scorpio-N +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Scorpio-N

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 78/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 76/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra Scorpio-N leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 67 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Scorpio-N leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Land Cruiser FJ vs Scorpio-N questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.