Mahindra Scorpio-N vs Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mahindra Scorpio-N in South Africa

Mahindra Scorpio-N

Z8L 4x4 AT Adventure Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 699,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV

PHEV Ultra Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 265 kW 🔧 530 Nm ⛽ 20.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mahindra Scorpio-N vs Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV: the short answer

Tiggo 7 PHEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Scorpio-N remains close.

Scorpio-N starts ZAR 109,901 cheaper Scorpio-N from ZAR 489,999 · Tiggo 7 PHEV from ZAR 599,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Scorpio-N Tiggo 7 PHEV
Maximum Power Scorpio-N128.6 kW @ 3500 rpm Tiggo 7 PHEV265 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Scorpio-N400 Nm Tiggo 7 PHEV530 Nm
Engine Size Scorpio-N2184 cc Tiggo 7 PHEV1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Scorpio-N14.5 km/l Tiggo 7 PHEV20.4 km/l
Ground Clearance Scorpio-N187 mm Tiggo 7 PHEV162 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Scorpio-N

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 7 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Scorpio-N

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 7 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Scorpio-N Tiggo 7 PHEV
Model Introduced Year Not Available 2026
Generation Current local listing Current South Africa Tiggo 7 PHEV range
Facelift History Not listed by current South African source page. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year Current 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1825-2070 kg 1825 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Scorpio-N Tiggo 7 PHEV
Length 4662 mm 4553 mm
Width 1918 mm 1862 mm
Height 1905 mm 1686 mm
Wheelbase 2750 mm 2670 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 187 mm 162 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 460 l 626 l
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 184 mm
Kerb Weight - 1825 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) - 2310 kg
Payload Capacity - 485 kg
Towing Capacity - 1500 kg
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Doors - 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius - 5.7 m
Front Headroom - 1010 mm
Rear Headroom - 970 mm
Front Legroom - 1050 mm
Rear Legroom - 950 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Scorpio-N and Tiggo 7 PHEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Scorpio-N 69 vs Tiggo 7 PHEV 91.

Efficiency index: Scorpio-N 60 vs Tiggo 7 PHEV 85.

Safety-equipment index: Scorpio-N 90 vs Tiggo 7 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: Scorpio-N 78 vs Tiggo 7 PHEV 68.

Ownership-cover index: Scorpio-N not separately scored vs Tiggo 7 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 7 PHEV leads by 10 points

Tiggo 7 PHEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Scorpio-N remains close.

Evidence leader 85 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 69% source coverage
85
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 7 PHEV

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 68
Performance 91
Efficiency 85
Safety 94
Practicality 68
Leads by 10 points
75
#2

Scorpio-N

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 69
Efficiency 60
Safety 90
Practicality 78
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 7 PHEV +22 Efficiency Tiggo 7 PHEV +25 Safety Tiggo 7 PHEV +4 Practicality Scorpio-N +10

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 7 PHEV

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 85/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 68/100

Scorpio-N

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 78/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV leads the specification evidence index with 85 pts vs 75 pts for Scorpio-N

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 7 PHEV leads. However, Scorpio-N may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Scorpio-N vs Tiggo 7 PHEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.