Geely E5 EM-i vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Geely E5 EM-i in South Africa

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 73 kW 🔧 125 Nm
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Geely E5 EM-i vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ: the short answer

E5 EM-i and Land Cruiser FJ are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

E5 EM-i starts ZAR 114,001 cheaper E5 EM-i from ZAR 599,999 · Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification E5 EM-i Land Cruiser FJ
Maximum Power E5 EM-i73 kW Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque E5 EM-i125 Nm Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size E5 EM-i1499 cc Land Cruiser FJ2700 cc
Combined Fuel Economy E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed Land Cruiser FJ9.3 km/l
Ground Clearance E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed Land Cruiser FJ245 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

E5 EM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

E5 EM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec E5 EM-i Land Cruiser FJ
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026
Facelift History No applicable South African facelift history established New South African model line launched in 2026
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable New South African model line launched in 2026
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current South African 2026 specification
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment Passenger vehicle SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1970 kg
Spec E5 EM-i Land Cruiser FJ
Length 4740 mm 4610 mm
Width 1905 mm 1855 mm
Height 1685 mm 1890 mm
Wheelbase 2755 mm 2580 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 245 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed -
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 63 l
Boot/Cargo Space 528 l -
Kerb Weight 1770 kg 1970 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2500 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed -
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 2500 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed -
Doors Not Officially Disclosed 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed -
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed -

In depth: how these cars differ

This E5 EM-i and Land Cruiser FJ comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: E5 EM-i 39 vs Land Cruiser FJ 56.

Efficiency index: E5 EM-i 79 vs Land Cruiser FJ 38.

Safety-equipment index: E5 EM-i 91 vs Land Cruiser FJ 93.

Practicality index: E5 EM-i 74 vs Land Cruiser FJ 76.

Ownership-cover index: E5 EM-i not separately scored vs Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

E5 EM-i leads by 3 points

E5 EM-i and Land Cruiser FJ are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 51% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

E5 EM-i

51% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 79
Safety 91
Practicality 74
Leads by 3 points
67
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

58% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 56
Efficiency 38
Safety 93
Practicality 76
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser FJ +17 Efficiency E5 EM-i +41 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +2 Practicality Land Cruiser FJ +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

E5 EM-i

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 74/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 76/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Geely E5 EM-i leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 67 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, E5 EM-i leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Sportage
Sportage
E5 EM-i vs Sportage →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
H7
H7
E5 EM-i vs H7 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
E5 EM-i vs T-Roc →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
E5 EM-i vs Tiguan →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
E5 EM-i vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Fortuner
Fortuner
E5 EM-i vs Fortuner →
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
VS
Sportage
Sportage
Land Cruiser FJ vs Sportage →
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
VS
H7
H7
Land Cruiser FJ vs H7 →

E5 EM-i vs Land Cruiser FJ questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.