Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Lexus RX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
VS
Lexus RX in South Africa

Lexus RX

RX 350 F SPORT Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,642,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 205 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 11.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Lexus RX: the short answer

RX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser FJ remains close.

Land Cruiser FJ starts ZAR 802,500 cheaper Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000 · RX from ZAR 1,516,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser FJ RX
Maximum Power Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm RX205 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm RX430 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser FJ2700 cc RX2400 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser FJ9.3 km/l RX11.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser FJ245 mm RX185 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

RX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

RX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser FJ RX
Model Introduced Year 2026 2023
Generation First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026 Fifth-generation Lexus RX luxury SUV
Facelift History New South African model line launched in 2026 Current fifth-generation South African range with petrol, hybrid, performance-hybrid and plug-in-hybrid choices
Facelift Launched Since New South African model line launched in 2026 Current fifth-generation South African range with petrol, hybrid, performance-hybrid and plug-in-hybrid choices
Facelift Version Ending Current South African 2026 specification Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment SUV Luxury SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1970 kg 1895-2005 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Land Cruiser FJ RX
Length 4610 mm 4890 mm
Width 1855 mm 1920 mm
Height 1890 mm 1695 mm
Wheelbase 2580 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 245 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l 67.5 l
Boot/Cargo Space 488 l 612 l
Kerb Weight 1970 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2500 kg 2590 kg
Payload Capacity 530 kg -
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.9 m
Front Headroom 994 mm -
Rear Headroom 958 mm -
Front Legroom 1044 mm -
Rear Legroom 900 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser FJ and RX comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser FJ 60 vs RX 85.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser FJ 38 vs RX 46.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser FJ 94 vs RX 93.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser FJ 74 vs RX 75.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored vs RX not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RX leads by 9 points

RX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Land Cruiser FJ remains close.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 70% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

RX

70% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 85
Efficiency 46
Safety 93
Practicality 75
Leads by 9 points
68
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

74% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 60
Efficiency 38
Safety 94
Practicality 74
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RX +25 Efficiency RX +8 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +1 Practicality RX +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RX

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 75/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 74/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus RX leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 68 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RX leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Land Cruiser FJ vs RX questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.