Toyota Land Cruiser 76 vs Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Land Cruiser 76
Fuel Economy Land Cruiser 76
🛡 Safety Land Cruiser FJ
📦 Practicality Land Cruiser 76
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Land Cruiser FJ starts ZAR 266,000 cheaper Land Cruiser 76 from ZAR 980,000 · Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Land Cruiser 76 Land Cruiser FJ
Maximum Power 202 kW 122 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque 381 Nm 245 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size 3956 cc 2700 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 13 km/l 9.3 km/l
Ground Clearance 230 mm 245 mm
Boot / Load Bay 909 l -
Airbags 2 Curtain, Driver, Passenger, Driver Knee, Front Side
Kerb Weight 2100 kg 1970 kg
Seating Capacity 8 seats 5 seats
Warranty 3 years / 100 000 km 3 years / 100 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Land Cruiser 76 and Land Cruiser FJ are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Land Cruiser 76 +21 pts
Efficiency Land Cruiser 76 +11 pts
Safety Land Cruiser FJ +43 pts
Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +20 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Catalogue-index leader

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser 76

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser 76 Land Cruiser FJ
Model Introduced Year 1984 2026
Generation 70 Series – one of the world's longest-running vehicle nameplates First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026
Facelift History Continuous mechanical updates while retaining core body-on-frame design. Minor updates in 2007, 2014, 2021 New South African model line launched in 2026
Facelift Launched Since 2021 New South African model line launched in 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African 2026 specification
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note White, Beige -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published published
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2100 kg 1970 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Land Cruiser 76 Land Cruiser FJ
Length 4890 mm 4610 mm
Width 1885 mm 1855 mm
Height 1970 mm 1890 mm
Wheelbase 2730 mm 2580 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 230 mm 245 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 87 l 63 l
Boot/Cargo Space 909 l -
Kerb Weight 2100 kg 1970 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3300 kg 2500 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 8 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6 m 5.5 m

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Land Cruiser FJ leads by 2 points

Land Cruiser 76 and Land Cruiser FJ are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 67 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 58% source coverage
67
#1 Index leader

Land Cruiser FJ

58% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 56
Efficiency 38
Safety 93
Practicality 76
Leads by 2 points
65
#2

Land Cruiser 76

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 96 Check Ownership 43
Performance 77
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 96
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 76 +21 Efficiency Land Cruiser 76 +11 Safety Land Cruiser FJ +43 Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +20

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 76/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 96/100
Ownership 43/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ leads the catalogue index with 67 pts vs 65 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Land Cruiser FJ leads. However, Land Cruiser 76 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Land Cruiser 76 and Land Cruiser FJ comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser 76 77 vs Land Cruiser FJ 56.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 76 49 vs Land Cruiser FJ 38.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 76 50 vs Land Cruiser FJ 93.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser 76 96 vs Land Cruiser FJ 76.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 76 43 vs Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.