Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ

2.7 4x4 VX 6AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 761,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 122 kW 🔧 245 Nm ⛽ 9.3 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV

PHEV Vanguard AWD Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 989,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 455 kW 🔧 920 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Land Cruiser FJ vs Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV: the short answer

Tiggo 9 PHEV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Land Cruiser FJ.

Land Cruiser FJ starts ZAR 125,900 cheaper Land Cruiser FJ from ZAR 714,000 · Tiggo 9 PHEV from ZAR 839,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Land Cruiser FJ Tiggo 9 PHEV
Maximum Power Land Cruiser FJ122 kW @ 5200 rpm Tiggo 9 PHEV455 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque Land Cruiser FJ245 Nm @ 4000 rpm Tiggo 9 PHEV920 Nm
Engine Size Land Cruiser FJ2700 cc Tiggo 9 PHEV1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Land Cruiser FJ9.3 km/l Tiggo 9 PHEV16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance Land Cruiser FJ245 mm Tiggo 9 PHEV183 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Land Cruiser FJ

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Land Cruiser FJ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 9 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Land Cruiser FJ Tiggo 9 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation First-generation compact Land Cruiser FJ introduced in South Africa in 2026 Current South Africa Tiggo 9 PHEV range
Facelift History New South African model line launched in 2026 Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since New South African model line launched in 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current South African 2026 specification Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1970 kg 2265 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Land Cruiser FJ Tiggo 9 PHEV
Length 4610 mm 4810 mm
Width 1855 mm 1925 mm
Height 1890 mm 1741 mm
Wheelbase 2580 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 245 mm 183 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 l 70 l
Kerb Weight 1970 kg 2265 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2500 kg 2886 kg
Towing Capacity 2500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.9 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 150 mm
Boot/Cargo Space - 448 l
Payload Capacity - 621 kg
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Front Headroom - 1025 mm
Rear Headroom - 990 mm
Front Legroom - 1060 mm
Rear Legroom - 960 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Land Cruiser FJ and Tiggo 9 PHEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Land Cruiser FJ 56 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 98.

Efficiency index: Land Cruiser FJ 38 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 72.

Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser FJ 93 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: Land Cruiser FJ 76 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV 70.

Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser FJ not separately scored vs Tiggo 9 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 9 PHEV leads by 18 points

Tiggo 9 PHEV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Land Cruiser FJ.

Evidence leader 85 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 69% source coverage
85
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

69% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Practicality 70
Performance 98
Efficiency 72
Safety 94
Practicality 70
Leads by 18 points
67
#2

Land Cruiser FJ

58% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 38
Performance 56
Efficiency 38
Safety 93
Practicality 76
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 9 PHEV +42 Efficiency Tiggo 9 PHEV +34 Safety Tiggo 9 PHEV +1 Practicality Land Cruiser FJ +6

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 9 PHEV

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 72/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 70/100

Land Cruiser FJ

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 38/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 76/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 9 PHEV leads the specification evidence index with 85 pts vs 67 pts for Land Cruiser FJ

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 9 PHEV leads. However, Land Cruiser FJ may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Land Cruiser FJ vs Tiggo 9 PHEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.