Hyundai i30 vs Suzuki Swift Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai i30 Discontinued model
Hyundai i30 in South Africa

Hyundai i30

1.0T Fluid Petrol 7-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 468,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 16.9 km/l
VS
Suzuki Swift Sport in South Africa

Suzuki Swift Sport

1.4 Turbo AT Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 493,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 103 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 15.6 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai i30 vs Suzuki Swift Sport: the short answer

i30 and Swift Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context i30: last listed from ZAR 432,900 · Swift Sport: current from ZAR 469,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification i30 Swift Sport
Maximum Power i3088 kW @ 5500 rpm Swift Sport103 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque i30172 Nm @ 1500 rpm Swift Sport230 Nm @ 3500 rpm
Engine Size i30998 cc Swift Sport1373 cc
Combined Fuel Economy i3016.9 km/l Swift Sport15.6 km/l
Ground Clearance i30135 mm Swift Sport130 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai i30 1.0T Fluid

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

i30

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Swift Sport

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

i30

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Swift Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec i30 Swift Sport
Model Introduced Year 2007 2019
Generation Third generation i30 on Hyundai's i-GMP-derived platform; the N Performance uses a more heavily engineered chassis with limited-slip differential and performance suspension ZC33S-series Swift Sport — third generation of the Sport nameplate globally; K14D BoosterJet replaces the naturally-aspirated M16A used in the previous generation; significant step change in performance and specification over the prior model
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2021
Tare Mass Kg 1285 kg 990 kg
Body Style Not confirmed Hatchback
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed published
Segment Not confirmed Hatchback
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Hatchback
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 1.4 Turbo AT
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Color Note Not confirmed Champion Yellow, Super White Pearl, Speedy Blue, Midnight Black Pearl, Burning Red Pearl
Facelift History Not confirmed Current K14D BoosterJet-engined Swift Sport generation launched in SA in 2019; AT variant added to the SA range in 2021; no major mechanical updates since launch; specification aligned with global ZC33S series
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Spec i30 Swift Sport
Length 4340 mm 3890 mm
Width 1795 mm 1735 mm
Height 1455 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase 2650 mm 2450 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 135 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 37 l
Boot/Cargo Space 395 l 265 l
Kerb Weight 1285 kg 990 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not confirmed 1390 kg
Payload Capacity Not confirmed 420 kg
Minimum Turning Radius Not confirmed 4.8 m
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1032 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed 890 mm
Front Headroom Not confirmed 965 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 962 mm
Number of Rows Not confirmed 2 rows

In depth: how these cars differ

This i30 and Swift Sport comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: i30 39 vs Swift Sport 50.

Efficiency index: i30 66 vs Swift Sport 60.

Safety-equipment index: i30 87 vs Swift Sport 87.

Practicality index: i30 60 vs Swift Sport 50.

Ownership-cover index: i30 65 vs Swift Sport 71.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

i30 leads by 0 points

i30 and Swift Sport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 63 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 89% source coverage
63
#1 Evidence leader

i30

89% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 66
Safety 87
Practicality 60
Ownership 65
Leads by 0 points
63
#2

Swift Sport

89% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 60
Safety 87
Practicality 50
Ownership 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Swift Sport +11 Efficiency i30 +6 Safety Level Practicality i30 +10 Ownership Swift Sport +6

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

i30

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 66/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 60/100
Ownership 65/100

Swift Sport

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai i30 leads the specification evidence index with 63 pts vs 63 pts for Swift Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, i30 leads. However, Swift Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

i30 vs Swift Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.