Hyundai i20 vs Suzuki S-Presso

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Hyundai i20 in South Africa

Hyundai i20

1.0T Fluid Petrol Manual
ZAR 328,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 74 kW 🔧 172 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Suzuki S-Presso in South Africa

Suzuki S-Presso

1.0 GL+ AMT S-Edition Petrol Automatic
ZAR 219,900 ex-showroom
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance S-Presso
Fuel Economy i20
🛡 Safety i20
📦 Practicality i20
🔑 Ownership i20
S-Presso starts ZAR 296900 cheaper i20 from ZAR 296,900 · S-Presso from ZAR 178,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec i20 S-Presso
Engine Power 74 -
Torque 172 -
Engine Size 998 -
Claimed Mileage 18.2 -
Ground Clearance 195 -
Boot Space 352 -
Airbags 6 -
Kerb Weight 1135 -
Seating Capacity 5 -
Warranty 5 -

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

i20 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance S-Presso +13 pts
Efficiency i20 +20 pts
Safety i20 +92 pts
Practicality i20 +14 pts
Ownership i20 +15 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

i20

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

S-Presso

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving

Which One's Right for You?

i20

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

S-Presso

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec i20 S-Presso
0–100 km/h 11.0 sec -
0-100 km/h 11.0 sec -
Acceleration 0 100 11.0 sec -
Active Exhaust Not Available -
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged -
Battery Capacity Not Available -
Charging Port Not Available -
AC Charging Time Not Available -
Combined System Power Not Available -
Combined System Torque Not Available -
Compression Ratio 10.0 -
Cylinders 3 -
Displacement 998 cc -
Engine 1.0 T-GDI Turbo -
Engine Code G3LE -
Engine Config 1.0 T-GDI Turbo -
Engine Cylinders 3 -
Engine Displacement 998 cc -
Engine Displacement Cc 998 cc -
Engine Displacement Litres 1 l -
Engine Position Front -
Engine Power kW 74 kW -
Engine Torque Nm 172 Nm -
Engine Type Petrol -
Engine Type Config Inline -
Engine Valves 12 -
EV Range Not Available -
Fuel Grade Required Petrol -
Fuel System Direct Injection -
Induction Turbocharged -
Max Power kW 74 kW -
Maximum Engine RPM 6500 rpm -
Max Torque Nm 172 Nm -
Maximum Power 74 kW -
Maximum Torque 172 Nm -
Motor Position Not Available -
Motor Power Not Available -
Motor Torque Not Available -
Motor Type Not Available -
Engine Oil Capacity 3.6 l -
Power 74 kW -
Power Assisted Steering MDPS Electric -
Power 99 bhp -
Power kW Rpm 5500 -
Power @ RPM 5500 -
System Output Not Available -
Top Speed 185 km/h -
Torque 172 Nm -
Torque Nm Rpm 1500 -
Torque @ RPM 1500 -
Turbo Type Turbocharged -
Turbocharger Yes -
Valves per Cylinder 12 -
Variable Valve Timing Yes -
Cylinder Layout Not Applicable -
Cylinder Bore Not Applicable -
Piston Stroke Not Applicable -
Spec i20 S-Presso
4WD Engagement Not Applicable -
4WD Hi Range Not Applicable -
4WD Lo Range Not Applicable -
4WD Selector Not Applicable -
Automatic Shift Paddles No -
Axle Layout Front-Wheel Drive -
Differential Lock No -
Differential Type Front Not Available -
Differential Type Rear Not Available -
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive -
Drivetrain Front-Wheel Drive -
Drivetrain Layout FWD -
Front Differential Lock Not Applicable -
Number of Gears 7 km/h -
Transmission Manual -
Gearbox Type Manual -
LSD Available No -
Low Range Not Applicable -
Paddle Shifters No -
Rear Differential Lock Not Applicable -
Transfer Case Not Applicable -
Transfer Case Guard Not Available -
Transmission Manual -
Transmission Speeds 7 km/h -
Transmission Type Manual -
Final Drive Ratio Not Applicable -
Clutch Type Not Applicable -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

i20 leads by 26 points

i20 dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Winner 65 /100
Lead 26 points
Data 91% confidence
65
#1 Winner

i20

91% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 37
Performance 37
Efficiency 70
Safety 92
Practicality 64
Ownership 65
Leads by 26 points
39
#2

S-Presso

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance S-Presso +13 Efficiency i20 +20 Safety i20 +92 Practicality i20 +14 Ownership i20 +15

High confidence result.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

i20

Performance 37/100
Efficiency 70/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 64/100
Ownership 65/100

S-Presso

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Hyundai i20 wins with 65 pts vs 39 pts for S-Presso

In structured scoring, i20 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, S-Presso may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the i20 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: i20 70 vs S-Presso 50. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: i20 92, S-Presso 0. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: i20 65, S-Presso 50. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: i20 64, S-Presso 50. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: i20 37, S-Presso 50. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The i20 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The i20 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between i20 and S-Presso in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: i20 scores 37 vs 50.

Efficiency: i20 scores 70 vs 50.

Safety: i20 scores 92 vs 0.

Practicality: i20 scores 64 vs 50.

Ownership: i20 scores 65 vs 50.

Final structured scoring gives i20 the advantage in this comparison.