MG HS vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 4 Cross in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 4 Cross

LiT MT Petrol Current
ZAR 279,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 83 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 14.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

MG HS vs Chery Tiggo 4 Cross: the short answer

HS has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 4 Cross remains close.

Tiggo 4 Cross starts ZAR 220,000 cheaper HS from ZAR 499,900 · Tiggo 4 Cross from ZAR 279,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification HS Tiggo 4 Cross
Maximum Power HS170 kW Tiggo 4 Cross83 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque HS370 Nm Tiggo 4 Cross170 Nm
Engine Size HS1986 cc Tiggo 4 Cross1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy HS11.63 km/l Tiggo 4 Cross14.3 km/l
Ground Clearance HS145 mm Tiggo 4 Cross180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Tiggo 4 Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Tiggo 4 Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec HS Tiggo 4 Cross
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains. Current South Africa Tiggo 4 Cross range
Facelift History Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door mid-size SUV SUV
Model Year 2025 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1309 kg
Spec HS Tiggo 4 Cross
Length 4655 mm 4351 mm
Width 1890 mm 1831 mm
Height 1655 mm 1662 mm
Wheelbase 2765 mm 2610 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 145 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 507 l 340 l
Kerb Weight 1590 kg 1309 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 1684 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 1300 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.65 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 968 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 964 mm 975 mm
Front Legroom 1044 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 980 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This HS and Tiggo 4 Cross comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: HS 70 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 38.

Efficiency index: HS 46 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 56.

Safety-equipment index: HS 98 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 91.

Practicality index: HS 57 vs Tiggo 4 Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: HS not separately scored vs Tiggo 4 Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

HS leads by 9 points

HS has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Tiggo 4 Cross remains close.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 78% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Leads by 9 points
60
#2

Tiggo 4 Cross

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +32 Efficiency Tiggo 4 Cross +10 Safety HS +7 Practicality HS +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

Tiggo 4 Cross

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index MG HS leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 60 pts for Tiggo 4 Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, HS leads. However, Tiggo 4 Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

HS
HS
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
HS vs UNI-S →
HS
HS
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
HS vs Tiggo 7 Pro →
HS
HS
VS
Seltos
Seltos
HS vs Seltos →
HS
HS
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
HS vs Jolion Pro →
HS
HS
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
HS vs ZS Pro →
HS
HS
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
HS vs T-Cross →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
Tiggo 4 Cross vs UNI-S →
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 4 Cross vs Tiggo 7 Pro →

HS vs Tiggo 4 Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.