MG HS vs RIDDARA RD6

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

MG HS in South Africa

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury Petrol 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 665,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 170 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.63 km/l
VS
RIDDARA RD6 in South Africa

RIDDARA RD6

Econ 2WD Pro 63 kWh Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 747,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 309 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

MG HS vs RIDDARA RD6: the short answer

HS and RD6 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

HS starts ZAR 247,600 cheaper HS from ZAR 499,900 · RD6 from ZAR 747,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification HS RD6
Maximum Power HS170 kW RD6180 kW
Maximum Torque HS370 Nm RD6309 Nm
Engine Size HS1986 cc RD6Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy HS11.63 km/l RD6Not Applicable
Ground Clearance HS145 mm RD6225 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

MG HS

2.0T AT Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

RIDDARA RD6

Econ 2WD Pro 63 kWh

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

HS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

RD6

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

HS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

RD6

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec HS RD6
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation Current five-seat HS on MG's SIGMA-A architecture with 1.5T DCT and 2.0T automatic powertrains. First South African RIDDARA RD6 generation
Facelift History Current-generation HS introduced locally in 2025; four petrol derivatives remain active. No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Five-door mid-size SUV Double-cab pickup
Model Year 2025 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Mid-size SUV Electric double-cab pickup
Vehicle Type SUV Battery-electric light commercial vehicle
Spec HS RD6
Length 4655 mm 5260 mm
Width 1890 mm 1900 mm
Height 1655 mm 1865 mm
Wheelbase 2765 mm 3120 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 145 mm 225 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 507 l 1200 l
Kerb Weight 1590 kg 2005 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 3120 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 1115 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.65 m 6.1 m
Front Headroom 968 mm 1033 mm
Rear Headroom 964 mm 1028 mm
Front Legroom 1044 mm 912 mm
Rear Legroom 980 mm 951 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This HS and RD6 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: HS 70 vs RD6 69.

Efficiency index: HS 46 vs RD6 90.

Safety-equipment index: HS 98 vs RD6 43.

Practicality index: HS 57 vs RD6 87.

Ownership-cover index: HS not separately scored vs RD6 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RD6 leads by 2 points

HS and RD6 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 69% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

RD6

69% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 90 Check Safety 43
Performance 69
Efficiency 90
Safety 43
Practicality 87
Leads by 2 points
69
#2

HS

78% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 70
Efficiency 46
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance HS +1 Efficiency RD6 +44 Safety HS +55 Practicality RD6 +30

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RD6

Performance 69/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 43/100
Practicality 87/100

HS

Performance 70/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index RIDDARA RD6 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 69 pts for HS

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RD6 leads. However, HS may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

HS
HS
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
HS vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
HS
HS
VS
03T
03T
HS vs 03T →
HS
HS
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
HS vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
HS
HS
VS
Triton Double Cab
Triton Double Cab
HS vs Triton Double Cab →
HS
HS
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
HS vs E5 EM-i →
HS
HS
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
HS vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
RD6
RD6
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
RD6 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
RD6
RD6
VS
03T
03T
RD6 vs 03T →

HS vs RD6 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.