GWM H2 vs Mahindra XUV700

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM H2 Discontinued model
GWM H2 in South Africa

GWM H2

1.5T LT Petrol 6-Speed DCT Discontinued model
ZAR 339,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 7.5 km/l
VS
Mahindra XUV700 in South Africa

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 627,899 ex-showroom
⚡ 149 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

GWM H2 vs Mahindra XUV700: the short answer

XUV700 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H2.

Recorded price context H2: last listed from ZAR 299,900 · XUV700: current from ZAR 495,199

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification H2 XUV700
Maximum Power H2110 kW @ 5500 rpm XUV700149 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque H2210 Nm XUV700380 Nm
Engine Size H21497 cc XUV7001997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy H27.5 km/l XUV70013 km/l
Ground Clearance H2175 mm XUV700200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

GWM H2

1.5T LT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mahindra XUV700

AX7L BE Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

H2

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

XUV700

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

H2

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

XUV700

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec H2 XUV700
Model Introduced Year 2017 Not Available
Generation First generation Haval H2 in SA, on sale 2017-2022. Discontinued in favour of the Jolion, which used a more modern platform and powertrain. Current local listing
Facelift History H2 received a mid-cycle update in 2019 that brought minor exterior styling changes, improved infotainment software and refinements to the DCT calibration. Updates continued through the model life to address recurring DCT issues, with the final 2022 specification being notably improved over the original 2017 launch model. Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2022 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg Not confirmed 2040 kg
Spec H2 XUV700
Length 4290 mm 4695 mm
Width 1800 mm 1890 mm
Height 1645 mm 1755 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 175 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 l 240 l
Kerb Weight 1650 kg 2040 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg -
Payload Capacity 550 kg -
Towing Capacity 2000 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m -
Front Headroom 990 mm -
Rear Headroom 960 mm -
Front Legroom 1040 mm -
Rear Legroom 870 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This H2 and XUV700 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: H2 45 vs XUV700 66.

Efficiency index: H2 35 vs XUV700 53.

Safety-equipment index: H2 73 vs XUV700 94.

Practicality index: H2 65 vs XUV700 67.

Ownership-cover index: H2 44 vs XUV700 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

XUV700 leads by 17 points

XUV700 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H2.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 17 points
Data 58% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

XUV700

58% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 66
Efficiency 53
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Leads by 17 points
54
#2

H2

95% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Efficiency 35
Performance 45
Efficiency 35
Safety 73
Practicality 65
Ownership 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance XUV700 +21 Efficiency XUV700 +18 Safety XUV700 +21 Practicality XUV700 +2

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

XUV700

Performance 66/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

H2

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 35/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 44/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mahindra XUV700 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 54 pts for H2

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, XUV700 leads. However, H2 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

H2
H2Discontinued
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
H2 vs ZS Pro →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
H2 vs T-Cross →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
H2 vs Jolion Pro →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Seltos
Seltos
H2 vs Seltos →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
H2 vs Tiggo 7 Pro →
H2
H2Discontinued
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
H2 vs UNI-S →
XUV700
XUV700
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
XUV700 vs ZS Pro →
XUV700
XUV700
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
XUV700 vs T-Cross →

H2 vs XUV700 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.