Toyota GR Yaris vs Nissan Navara Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Yaris in South Africa

Toyota GR Yaris

1.6T GR-Four Rally 6MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 897,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 200 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.5 km/l
VS
Nissan Navara Single Cab in South Africa

Nissan Navara Single Cab

2.5D SE Single Cab 4x4 MT Diesel 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 592,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 403 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Yaris vs Nissan Navara Single Cab: the short answer

Navara Single Cab has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GR Yaris remains close.

Navara Single Cab starts ZAR 463,900 cheaper GR Yaris from ZAR 897,400 · Navara Single Cab from ZAR 433,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Yaris Navara Single Cab
Maximum Power GR Yaris200 kW Navara Single Cab120 kW @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque GR Yaris370 Nm Navara Single Cab403 Nm @ 2000 rpm
Engine Size GR Yaris1618 cc Navara Single Cab2488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR Yaris11.5 km/l Navara Single Cab13.2 km/l
Ground Clearance GR Yaris180 mm Navara Single Cab208 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR Yaris

1.6T GR-Four Rally 6MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Nissan Navara Single Cab

2.5D SE Single Cab 4x4 MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

GR Yaris

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Navara Single Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Yaris

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Navara Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Yaris Navara Single Cab
Model Introduced Year 2021 1997
Generation First generation GR Yaris – purpose-built WRC homologation road car Current Navara generation focuses on improved comfort and stronger safety credentials
Facelift History High-performance 8AT added to the range in 2023 Updated in recent years with improved styling, safety upgrades, and suspension refinement
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Single Cab
Color Note Circuit Yellow, White Pearl, Black White, Silver, Black, Grey, Red, Blue
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment Hatchback Single-cab bakkie
Tare Mass Kg 1280 kg 1803 kg
Vehicle Type Hatchback Single Cab
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.5D SE Single Cab 4x4 MT
Spec GR Yaris Navara Single Cab
Length 3995 mm 5235 mm
Width 1805 mm 1790 mm
Height 1455 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 3150 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 208 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 174 l -
Kerb Weight 1280 kg 1803 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1620 kg 3010 kg
Payload Capacity 340 kg 1119 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 6.4 m
Front Headroom 981 mm -
Rear Headroom 957 mm -
Front Legroom 1038 mm -
Rear Legroom 885 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Yaris and Navara Single Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Yaris 85 vs Navara Single Cab 67.

Efficiency index: GR Yaris 45 vs Navara Single Cab 56.

Safety-equipment index: GR Yaris 90 vs Navara Single Cab 90.

Practicality index: GR Yaris 46 vs Navara Single Cab 72.

Ownership-cover index: GR Yaris 43 vs Navara Single Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Navara Single Cab leads by 8 points

Navara Single Cab has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GR Yaris remains close.

Evidence leader 72 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 56% source coverage
72
#1 Evidence leader

Navara Single Cab

56% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 56
Performance 67
Efficiency 56
Safety 90
Practicality 72
Leads by 8 points
64
#2

GR Yaris

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Ownership 43
Performance 85
Efficiency 45
Safety 90
Practicality 46
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR Yaris +18 Efficiency Navara Single Cab +11 Safety Level Practicality Navara Single Cab +26

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Navara Single Cab

Performance 67/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 72/100

GR Yaris

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 46/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Nissan Navara Single Cab leads the specification evidence index with 72 pts vs 64 pts for GR Yaris

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Navara Single Cab leads. However, GR Yaris may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
D-Max X-Rider
D-Max X-Rider
GR Yaris vs D-Max X-Rider →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dawn
Karoo Special Edition Dawn
GR Yaris vs Karoo Special Edition Dawn →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Karoo Special Edition Storm
Karoo Special Edition Storm
GR Yaris vs Karoo Special Edition Storm →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dew
Karoo Special Edition Dew
GR Yaris vs Karoo Special Edition Dew →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dusk
Karoo Special Edition Dusk
GR Yaris vs Karoo Special Edition Dusk →
GR Yaris
GR Yaris
VS
Ranger XLT
Ranger XLT
GR Yaris vs Ranger XLT →
Navara Single Cab
Navara Single Cab
VS
D-Max X-Rider
D-Max X-Rider
Navara Single Cab vs D-Max X-Rider →
Navara Single Cab
Navara Single Cab
VS
Karoo Special Edition Dawn
Karoo Special Edition Dawn
Navara Single Cab vs Karoo Special Edition Dawn →

GR Yaris vs Navara Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.