Toyota GR Yaris vs Mazda Mazda3

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Yaris in South Africa

Toyota GR Yaris

1.6T GR-Four Rally 6MT Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 897,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 200 kW 🔧 370 Nm ⛽ 11.5 km/l
VS
Mazda Mazda3 in South Africa

Mazda Mazda3

2.0 Astina Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 629,700 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Yaris vs Mazda Mazda3: the short answer

GR Yaris and Mazda3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Mazda3 starts ZAR 399,100 cheaper GR Yaris from ZAR 897,400 · Mazda3 from ZAR 498,300

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Yaris Mazda3
Maximum Power GR Yaris200 kW Mazda3121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque GR Yaris370 Nm Mazda3213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size GR Yaris1618 cc Mazda31998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy GR Yaris11.5 km/l Mazda315.9 km/l
Ground Clearance GR Yaris180 mm Mazda3140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

GR Yaris

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Mazda3

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Yaris

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Mazda3

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Yaris Mazda3
Model Introduced Year 2021 2019
Generation First generation GR Yaris – purpose-built WRC homologation road car Seventh-generation BP-series Mazda3 hatchback
Facelift History High-performance 8AT added to the range in 2023 The seventh-generation South African hatchback launched in 2019 and the current range has since been consolidated to Dynamic and Astina editions.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2019
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Hatchback
Color Note Circuit Yellow, White Pearl, Black -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment Hatchback C-segment hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 1280 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Type Hatchback Hatchback
Spec GR Yaris Mazda3
Length 3995 mm 4460 mm
Width 1805 mm 1795 mm
Height 1455 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 2725 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 174 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 1280 kg 1350 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1620 kg 1870 kg
Payload Capacity 340 kg 520 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.3 m
Front Headroom 981 mm -
Rear Headroom 957 mm -
Front Legroom 1038 mm 1075 mm
Rear Legroom 885 mm 891 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Yaris and Mazda3 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Yaris 85 vs Mazda3 50.

Efficiency index: GR Yaris 45 vs Mazda3 61.

Safety-equipment index: GR Yaris 90 vs Mazda3 96.

Practicality index: GR Yaris 46 vs Mazda3 50.

Ownership-cover index: GR Yaris 43 vs Mazda3 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GR Yaris leads by 0 points

GR Yaris and Mazda3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 90% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

GR Yaris

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Ownership 43
Performance 85
Efficiency 45
Safety 90
Practicality 46
Ownership 43
Leads by 0 points
64
#2

Mazda3

77% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 61
Safety 96
Practicality 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR Yaris +35 Efficiency Mazda3 +16 Safety Mazda3 +6 Practicality Mazda3 +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GR Yaris

Performance 85/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 46/100
Ownership 43/100

Mazda3

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 50/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota GR Yaris leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 64 pts for Mazda3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GR Yaris leads. However, Mazda3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

GR Yaris vs Mazda3 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.