Toyota GR Supra vs GWM ORA 5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
VS
GWM ORA 5 in South Africa

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury Electric Current
ZAR 599,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 260 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota GR Supra vs GWM ORA 5: the short answer

GR Supra and ORA 5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

ORA 5 starts ZAR 1,159,900 cheaper GR Supra from ZAR 1,524,800 · ORA 5 from ZAR 364,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification GR Supra ORA 5
Maximum Power GR Supra285 kW ORA 5150 kW
Maximum Torque GR Supra500 Nm ORA 5260 Nm
Engine Size GR Supra2998 cc ORA 5Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy GR Supra12 km/l ORA 5Not Applicable
Ground Clearance GR Supra117 mm ORA 5175 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

GR Supra

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

ORA 5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

GR Supra

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

ORA 5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec GR Supra ORA 5
Model Introduced Year 2021 2026
Generation A90 fifth generation – co-developed with BMW on the CLAR platform First-generation ORA 5; South African launch specification
Facelift History Manual gearbox and power upgrade (280 kW→285 kW) in 2023 No facelift; first South African model year
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style Sedan Compact SUV
Color Note Matte White, Nitro Yellow, Renaissance Red, Gravure Grey, Tungsten Silver, Black -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active On sale
Segment Sedan Compact SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1545 kg -
Vehicle Type Sedan Passenger vehicle
Spec GR Supra ORA 5
Length 4380 mm 4471 mm
Width 1865 mm 1833 mm
Height 1294 mm 1641 mm
Wheelbase 2470 mm 2720 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 117 mm 175 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 115 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 52 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 290 l 228 l
Kerb Weight 1545 kg 1555 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1870 kg 1970 kg
Payload Capacity 325 kg 415 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.3 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 995 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 960 mm
Front Legroom 1040 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This GR Supra and ORA 5 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: GR Supra 94 vs ORA 5 56.

Efficiency index: GR Supra 47 vs ORA 5 90.

Safety-equipment index: GR Supra 98 vs ORA 5 88.

Practicality index: GR Supra 40 vs ORA 5 54.

Ownership-cover index: GR Supra 43 vs ORA 5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

ORA 5 leads by 4 points

GR Supra and ORA 5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 62% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

ORA 5

62% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 90 Check Practicality 54
Performance 56
Efficiency 90
Safety 88
Practicality 54
Leads by 4 points
67
#2

GR Supra

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 40
Performance 94
Efficiency 47
Safety 98
Practicality 40
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR Supra +38 Efficiency ORA 5 +43 Safety GR Supra +10 Practicality ORA 5 +14

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

ORA 5

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 54/100

GR Supra

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 40/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM ORA 5 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 67 pts for GR Supra

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, ORA 5 leads. However, GR Supra may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
CLA Hybrid
CLA HybridUpcoming
GR Supra vs CLA Hybrid →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
C-Class
C-Class
GR Supra vs C-Class →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
UX
UX
GR Supra vs UX →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
3 Series
3 Series
GR Supra vs 3 Series →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
Land Cruiser Prado
Land Cruiser Prado
GR Supra vs Land Cruiser Prado →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
Land Cruiser 76
Land Cruiser 76
GR Supra vs Land Cruiser 76 →
ORA 5
ORA 5
VS
CLA Hybrid
CLA HybridUpcoming
ORA 5 vs CLA Hybrid →
ORA 5
ORA 5
VS
C-Class
C-Class
ORA 5 vs C-Class →

GR Supra vs ORA 5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.