LDV G10+ Van vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

LDV G10+ Van in South Africa

LDV G10+ Van

G10+ Van 2.0D 8-Speed Automatic Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 565,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 118 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 11.49 km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab in South Africa

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 200 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

LDV G10+ Van vs Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab: the short answer

G10+ Van has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Triton Single Cab remains close.

Triton Single Cab starts ZAR 65,210 cheaper G10+ Van from ZAR 565,200 · Triton Single Cab from ZAR 499,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification G10+ Van Triton Single Cab
Maximum Power G10+ Van118 kW Triton Single Cab81 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque G10+ Van375 Nm Triton Single Cab200 Nm @ 1000-3750 rpm
Engine Size G10+ Van1996 cc Triton Single Cab2442 cc
Combined Fuel Economy G10+ Van11.49 km/l Triton Single Cab12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance G10+ VanNot Officially Disclosed Triton Single Cab200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

LDV G10+ Van

G10+ Van 2.0D 8-Speed Automatic

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mitsubishi Triton Single Cab

2.4L 4x2 GL M/T

Hagalu editorial rating
4.3/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

G10+ Van

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Triton Single Cab

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

G10+ Van

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Triton Single Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec G10+ Van Triton Single Cab
Model Introduced Year 2026 2024
Generation Current South African G10+ Van generation. Sixth-generation Triton
Facelift History No later South African facelift is published. Next-Gen Triton launched in South Africa in November 2024.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Two-seat medium panel van Single-cab pickup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Van One-ton single-cab pickup
Vehicle Type Van Light commercial vehicle
Spec G10+ Van Triton Single Cab
Length 5168 mm 5320 mm
Width 1980 mm 1865 mm
Height 1928 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase 3198 mm 3130 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space 5200 l 1904 l
Kerb Weight 2085 kg 1625 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3000 kg 2570 kg
Payload Capacity 915 kg 945 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 1 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 6.35 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1007 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1059 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This G10+ Van and Triton Single Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: G10+ Van 61 vs Triton Single Cab 34.

Efficiency index: G10+ Van 46 vs Triton Single Cab 49.

Safety-equipment index: G10+ Van 50 vs Triton Single Cab 32.

Practicality index: G10+ Van 63 vs Triton Single Cab 72.

Ownership-cover index: G10+ Van not separately scored vs Triton Single Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

G10+ Van leads by 10 points

G10+ Van has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Triton Single Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 56 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 68% source coverage
56
#1 Evidence leader

G10+ Van

68% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Practicality 63 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 61
Efficiency 46
Safety 50
Practicality 63
Leads by 10 points
46
#2

Triton Single Cab

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 72 Check Safety 32
Performance 34
Efficiency 49
Safety 32
Practicality 72
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance G10+ Van +27 Efficiency Triton Single Cab +3 Safety G10+ Van +18 Practicality Triton Single Cab +9

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

G10+ Van

Performance 61/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 63/100

Triton Single Cab

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 72/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index LDV G10+ Van leads the specification evidence index with 56 pts vs 46 pts for Triton Single Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, G10+ Van leads. However, Triton Single Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

G10+ Van vs Triton Single Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.