Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota GR Supra

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Fronx in South Africa

Suzuki Fronx

1.5 GLX AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 372,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Toyota GR Supra in South Africa

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,561,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 285 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota GR Supra: the short answer

GR Supra has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Fronx remains close.

Fronx starts ZAR 1,220,900 cheaper Fronx from ZAR 303,900 · GR Supra from ZAR 1,524,800

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Fronx GR Supra
Maximum Power Fronx77 kW GR Supra285 kW
Maximum Torque Fronx138 Nm GR Supra500 Nm
Engine Size Fronx1462 cc GR Supra2998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Fronx16.1 km/l GR Supra12 km/l
Ground Clearance Fronx0 mm GR Supra117 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Suzuki Fronx

1.5 GLX AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Toyota GR Supra

3.0T Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Fronx

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

GR Supra

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Fronx

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

GR Supra

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Fronx GR Supra
Model Introduced Year 2026 2021
Generation Current market generation A90 fifth generation – co-developed with BMW on the CLAR platform
Facelift History Current market specification Manual gearbox and power upgrade (280 kW→285 kW) in 2023
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Sedan
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Sedan
Vehicle Type SUV Sedan
Color Note - Matte White, Nitro Yellow, Renaissance Red, Gravure Grey, Tungsten Silver, Black
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Tare Mass Kg - 1545 kg
Spec Fronx GR Supra
Length 3995 mm 4380 mm
Width 1765 mm 1865 mm
Height 1550 mm 1294 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 2470 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 117 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 52 l
Boot/Cargo Space 308 l 290 l
Kerb Weight 1060 kg 1545 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1540 kg 1870 kg
Payload Capacity 480 kg 325 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 1 rows
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 6.3 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 995 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm Not Applicable
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm Not Applicable

In depth: how these cars differ

This Fronx and GR Supra comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Fronx 34 vs GR Supra 94.

Efficiency index: Fronx 62 vs GR Supra 47.

Safety-equipment index: Fronx 87 vs GR Supra 98.

Practicality index: Fronx 48 vs GR Supra 40.

Ownership-cover index: Fronx not separately scored vs GR Supra 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GR Supra leads by 10 points

GR Supra has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Fronx remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 90% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

GR Supra

90% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Practicality 40
Performance 94
Efficiency 47
Safety 98
Practicality 40
Ownership 43
Leads by 10 points
57
#2

Fronx

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GR Supra +60 Efficiency Fronx +15 Safety GR Supra +11 Practicality Fronx +8

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GR Supra

Performance 94/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 40/100
Ownership 43/100

Fronx

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota GR Supra leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 57 pts for Fronx

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GR Supra leads. However, Fronx may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Fronx
Fronx
VS
3 Series
3 Series
Fronx vs 3 Series →
Fronx
Fronx
VS
GLA
GLA
Fronx vs GLA →
Fronx
Fronx
VS
D90
D90
Fronx vs D90 →
Fronx
Fronx
VS
C-Class
C-Class
Fronx vs C-Class →
Fronx
Fronx
VS
CLA Hybrid
CLA HybridUpcoming
Fronx vs CLA Hybrid →
Fronx
Fronx
VS
X2
X2
Fronx vs X2 →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
3 Series
3 Series
GR Supra vs 3 Series →
GR Supra
GR Supra
VS
GLA
GLA
GR Supra vs GLA →

Fronx vs GR Supra questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.