Ford Everest vs Chery Tiggo 7

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,340,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 7 in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 7

Prime 1.5T DCT Petrol Automatic
ZAR 429,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 108 kW 🔧 210 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Everest
Fuel Economy Tiggo 7
🛡 Safety Tiggo 7
📦 Practicality Everest
🔑 Ownership Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7 starts ZAR 825000 cheaper Everest from ZAR 825,000 · Tiggo 7 from ZAR 429,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Everest Tiggo 7
Engine Power 184 kW 108 kW
Torque 600 Nm 210 Nm
Engine Size 2993 cc 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage 11.8 km/l 14.5 km/l
Ground Clearance 226 mm 154 mm
Boot / Load Bay Three-row cargo area 565 l
Airbags 6 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 2450 kg -
Seating Capacity 7 5
Warranty 4 years / 120 000 km 5 Year / 150 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both Everest and Tiggo 7 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Everest +45 pts
Efficiency Tiggo 7 +6 pts
Safety Tiggo 7 +30 pts
Practicality Everest +20 pts
Ownership Tiggo 7 +21 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Tiggo 7

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Tiggo 7

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Everest Tiggo 7
Model Introduced Year 2015 2026
Generation Currently sold Everest belongs to the latest generation with enhanced comfort and safety systems Current South Africa Tiggo 7 range
Facelift History Major generational update in 2022 with improved safety, technology, and design Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2022 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Large SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Everest Tiggo 7
Ground Clearance 226 mm 154 mm
Wheelbase 2900 mm 2670 mm
Length 4914 mm 4553 mm
Width 1923 mm 1862 mm
Height 1842 mm 1686 mm
Kerb Weight 2450 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight - -
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space Three-row cargo area 565 l
Towing Capacity 3500 kg -
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Turning Radius - -
Load Bed Length Three-row cargo area 565 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom - -
Rear Legroom - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -
Front Shoulder Room - -
Rear Shoulder Room - -
Boot Space Seats Folded - 1396 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload - -
Boot Volume Three-row cargo area 565 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 7 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 80 l 51 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - -
Ground Clearance Max 226 mm 154 mm
Ground Clearance Min 226 mm 154 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 226 mm 154 mm
Height Mm 1842 mm 1686 mm
Length Mm 4914 mm 4553 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Three-row cargo area 565 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg - -
Cargo Volume Three-row cargo area 565 l
Tare Mass Kg 2450 kg -
Turning Circle - -
Turning Circle M - -
Width Mm 1923 mm 1862 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Everest leads by 5 points

Both Everest and Tiggo 7 are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 66 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 77% confidence
66
#1 Winner

Everest

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 92 Check Ownership 34
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 45
Practicality 92
Ownership 34
Leads by 5 points
61
#2

Tiggo 7

72% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 75 Check Performance 46
Performance 46
Efficiency 58
Safety 75
Practicality 72
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Everest +45 Efficiency Tiggo 7 +6 Safety Tiggo 7 +30 Practicality Everest +20 Ownership Tiggo 7 +21

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 45/100
Practicality 92/100
Ownership 34/100

Tiggo 7

Performance 46/100
Efficiency 58/100
Safety 75/100
Practicality 72/100
Ownership 55/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 66 pts vs 61 pts for Tiggo 7

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Tiggo 7 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Everest edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Everest 52 vs Tiggo 7 58. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Everest 45, Tiggo 7 75. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Everest 34, Tiggo 7 55. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Everest 92, Tiggo 7 72. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Everest 91, Tiggo 7 46. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Everest edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Everest scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Everest and Tiggo 7 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 91 vs 46.

Efficiency: Everest scores 52 vs 58.

Safety: Everest scores 45 vs 75.

Practicality: Everest scores 92 vs 72.

Ownership: Everest scores 34 vs 55.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.