Ford Everest vs Hyundai i20

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Hyundai i20 in South Africa

Hyundai i20

1.0T Fluid Petrol manual
328,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 74 kW (99 hp)
🔧 172 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
+

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

Performance Everest
Mileage Everest
🔑 Ownership i20

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+11
pts
#2

i20

57
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Everest has a slight advantage, but i20 remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +6 pts
Efficiency Everest +7 pts
Safety Everest +2 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership i20 +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

i20

Performance 7/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency

i20

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

i20

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest i20
Ground Clearance 220 195
Wheelbase 2900 2580
Length 4914 4040
Width 1923 1775
Height 1842 1505
Kerb Weight 2305 1135
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 -
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 259 352
Towing Capacity 3500 -
Specification Everest i20
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 1.0 T-GDI Turbo
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Petrol
Displacement 1996 998
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 -
Power 125 74
Torque 405 172
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 180 185
0-100 km/h 11.5 11.0
Turbocharger - Yes
Power @ RPM - @ 5500 rpm
Torque @ RPM - @ 1500 rpm

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 57 pts for i20

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, i20 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while i20 scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and i20 scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus i20 scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and i20 12, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to i20 scoring 7, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and i20 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 7.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 0.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 12.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.