Ford Everest vs Hyundai Grand i10

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Ford Everest in South Africa

Ford Everest

3.0TD V6 Platinum 10AT 4WD Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,099,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW (168 hp)
🔧 405 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Hyundai Grand i10 in South Africa

Hyundai Grand i10

1.2 Fluid Petrol manual
242,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 61 kW (82 hp)
🔧 114 Nm
⛽ 16.5 km/l
+
＋

Add a 3rd car to compare

Quick Winners

⚡ Performance Everest
⛽ Mileage Everest
🔑 Ownership Grand i10

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner
#1

Everest

68
/ 100
+16
pts
#2

Grand i10

52
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

Executive Summary

Everest holds a noticeable edge over Grand i10, especially in key ownership areas.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance Everest +8 pts
Efficiency Everest +7 pts
Safety Everest +2 pts
Practicality Everest +3 pts
Ownership Grand i10 +4 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 16/20

Grand i10

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 0/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 9/20
Ownership 20/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

Everest

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Cons
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Grand i10

Pros
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best For: General Use

Who Should Buy Which?

Everest

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Grand i10

  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Everest Grand i10
Ground Clearance 220 170
Wheelbase 2900 2385
Length 4914 3665
Width 1923 1660
Height 1842 1520
Kerb Weight 2305 975
Gross Vehicle Weight 3100 -
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 259 235
Towing Capacity 3500 -
Specification Everest Grand i10
Engine 2.0L Single Turbo Diesel 1.2 MPI DOHC
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Petrol
Displacement 1996 1197
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 -
Power 125 61
Torque 405 114
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Multi-Point Fuel Injection
Top Speed 180 171
0-100 km/h 11.5 12.8
Turbocharger - No
Power @ RPM - @ 6300 rpm
Torque @ RPM - @ 4200 rpm

Final Verdict

🏆 Ford Everest wins with 68 pts vs 52 pts for Grand i10

In structured scoring, Everest emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Grand i10 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related Comparisons

See how similar cars stack up against each other.

Everest
Everest
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Everest vs EcoSport →
Everest
Everest
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Everest vs Mustang →
Everest
Everest
VS
Puma
Puma
Everest vs Puma →
Everest
Everest
VS
Ranger
Ranger
Everest vs Ranger →
Everest
Everest
VS
Territory
Territory
Everest vs Territory →
Everest
Everest
VS
Amaze
Amaze
Everest vs Amaze →
Grand i10
Grand i10
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Grand i10 vs EcoSport →
Grand i10
Grand i10
VS
Mustang
Mustang
Grand i10 vs Mustang →

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Everest
Everest
VS
EcoSport
EcoSport
Everest vs EcoSport →
Everest
Everest
VS
Puma
Puma
Everest vs Puma →
Everest
Everest
VS
Territory
Territory
Everest vs Territory →
Everest
Everest
VS
CR-V
CR-V
Everest vs CR-V →
Everest
Everest
VS
Elevate
Elevate
Everest vs Elevate →
Everest
Everest
VS
HR-V
HR-V
Everest vs HR-V →

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, Everest performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Everest scores 7 while Grand i10 scores 0 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Everest scores 20 and Grand i10 scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Everest scores 16 versus Grand i10 scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Everest 12 and Grand i10 9, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Everest scoring 13 compared to Grand i10 scoring 5, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest Everest may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. Everest performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives Everest the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Everest and Grand i10 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Everest scores 13 vs 5.

Efficiency: Everest scores 7 vs 0.

Safety: Everest scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: Everest scores 12 vs 9.

Ownership: Everest scores 16 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives Everest the advantage in this comparison.