Geely E5 EM-i vs JAC T9 Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Geely E5 EM-i in South Africa

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 73 kW 🔧 125 Nm
VS
JAC T9 Double Cab in South Africa

JAC T9 Double Cab

T9 2.0L CTi Hunter 4x2 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 629,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 144 kW 🔧 487 Nm ⛽ 12.66 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Geely E5 EM-i vs JAC T9 Double Cab: the short answer

E5 EM-i and T9 Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

T9 Double Cab starts ZAR 50,099 cheaper E5 EM-i from ZAR 599,999 · T9 Double Cab from ZAR 549,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification E5 EM-i T9 Double Cab
Maximum Power E5 EM-i73 kW T9 Double Cab144 kW @ 3014 rpm
Maximum Torque E5 EM-i125 Nm T9 Double Cab487 Nm
Engine Size E5 EM-i1499 cc T9 Double Cab1999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed T9 Double Cab12.66 km/l
Ground Clearance E5 EM-i172 mm T9 Double Cab210 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

JAC T9 Double Cab

T9 2.0L CTi Hunter 4x2

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

E5 EM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

T9 Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

E5 EM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

T9 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec E5 EM-i T9 Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published Current South African T9 Double Cab range verified on 7 September 2026
Facelift History No applicable South African facelift history established No later South African facelift was identified in the current official model and brochure material
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Not Applicable
Body Style SUV Double-cab bakkie
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Passenger vehicle Double-cab bakkie
Vehicle Type SUV Double-cab pickup
Spec E5 EM-i T9 Double Cab
Length 4740 mm 5330 mm
Width 1905 mm 1965 mm
Height 1685 mm 1920 mm
Wheelbase 2755 mm 3110 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 172 mm 210 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 76 l
Boot/Cargo Space 528 l Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight 1770 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2945 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1000 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 3500 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Doors Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 6.2 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This E5 EM-i and T9 Double Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: E5 EM-i 39 vs T9 Double Cab 74.

Efficiency index: E5 EM-i 79 vs T9 Double Cab 54.

Safety-equipment index: E5 EM-i 91 vs T9 Double Cab 85.

Practicality index: E5 EM-i 71 vs T9 Double Cab 86.

Ownership-cover index: E5 EM-i not separately scored vs T9 Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

T9 Double Cab leads by 7 points

E5 EM-i and T9 Double Cab are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 59% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

T9 Double Cab

59% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Practicality 86 Check Efficiency 54
Performance 74
Efficiency 54
Safety 85
Practicality 86
Leads by 7 points
69
#2

E5 EM-i

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 79
Safety 91
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T9 Double Cab +35 Efficiency E5 EM-i +25 Safety E5 EM-i +6 Practicality T9 Double Cab +15

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

T9 Double Cab

Performance 74/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 85/100
Practicality 86/100

E5 EM-i

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index JAC T9 Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 69 pts for E5 EM-i

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, T9 Double Cab leads. However, E5 EM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Hilux Xtra Cab
Hilux Xtra Cab
E5 EM-i vs Hilux Xtra Cab →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
E5 EM-i vs D-Max Double Cab →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
CX-5
CX-5
E5 EM-i vs CX-5 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
T2
T2
E5 EM-i vs T2 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tucson
Tucson
E5 EM-i vs Tucson →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Hilux Double Cab
Hilux Double Cab
E5 EM-i vs Hilux Double Cab →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
Hilux Xtra Cab
Hilux Xtra Cab
T9 Double Cab vs Hilux Xtra Cab →
T9 Double Cab
T9 Double Cab
VS
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
T9 Double Cab vs D-Max Double Cab →

E5 EM-i vs T9 Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.