Geely E5 EM-i vs Jetour T2

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Geely E5 EM-i in South Africa

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 73 kW 🔧 125 Nm
VS
Jetour T2 in South Africa

Jetour T2

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 679,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 10.8 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Geely E5 EM-i vs Jetour T2: the short answer

E5 EM-i and T2 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

T2 starts ZAR 30,099 cheaper E5 EM-i from ZAR 599,999 · T2 from ZAR 569,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification E5 EM-i T2
Maximum Power E5 EM-i73 kW T2180 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque E5 EM-i125 Nm T2375 Nm
Engine Size E5 EM-i1499 cc T21998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed T210.8 km/l
Ground Clearance E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed T2220 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

E5 EM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

T2

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

E5 EM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

T2

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec E5 EM-i T2
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published Current local listing
Facelift History No applicable South African facelift history established Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2026
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status active Active
Segment Passenger vehicle SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 3855 kg
Tare Mass Kg - 1880 kg
Spec E5 EM-i T2
Length 4740 mm 4785 mm
Width 1905 mm 2006 mm
Height 1685 mm 1880 mm
Wheelbase 2755 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 220 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 528 l 580 l
Kerb Weight 1770 kg 1880 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 2255 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 375 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 1600 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed 2 rows
Doors Not Officially Disclosed 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.8 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1040 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1020 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1055 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 935 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This E5 EM-i and T2 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: E5 EM-i 39 vs T2 77.

Efficiency index: E5 EM-i 79 vs T2 43.

Safety-equipment index: E5 EM-i 91 vs T2 93.

Practicality index: E5 EM-i 74 vs T2 70.

Ownership-cover index: E5 EM-i not separately scored vs T2 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

T2 leads by 3 points

E5 EM-i and T2 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 67% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

T2

67% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 43
Performance 77
Efficiency 43
Safety 93
Practicality 70
Leads by 3 points
70
#2

E5 EM-i

51% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 79
Safety 91
Practicality 74
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T2 +38 Efficiency E5 EM-i +36 Safety T2 +2 Practicality E5 EM-i +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

T2

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 43/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 70/100

E5 EM-i

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 74/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Jetour T2 leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 70 pts for E5 EM-i

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, T2 leads. However, E5 EM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
H6
H6
E5 EM-i vs H6 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
CX-5
CX-5
E5 EM-i vs CX-5 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
E5 EM-i vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tucson
Tucson
E5 EM-i vs Tucson →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
E5 EM-i vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Harrier
Harrier
E5 EM-i vs Harrier →
T2
T2
VS
H6
H6
T2 vs H6 →
T2
T2
VS
CX-5
CX-5
T2 vs CX-5 →

E5 EM-i vs T2 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.