Geely E5 EM-i vs LDV T60 Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Geely E5 EM-i in South Africa

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 679,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 73 kW 🔧 125 Nm
VS
LDV T60 Double Cab in South Africa

LDV T60 Double Cab

T60 Max Luxe 4WD Double Cab 6-Speed Manual Diesel 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 750,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 10.75 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Geely E5 EM-i vs LDV T60 Double Cab: the short answer

T60 Double Cab has a modest catalogue-index lead, while E5 EM-i remains close.

T60 Double Cab starts ZAR 119,999 cheaper E5 EM-i from ZAR 599,999 · T60 Double Cab from ZAR 480,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification E5 EM-i T60 Double Cab
Maximum Power E5 EM-i73 kW T60 Double Cab160 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque E5 EM-i125 Nm T60 Double Cab500 Nm @ 1500-2400 rpm
Engine Size E5 EM-i1499 cc T60 Double Cab1996 cc
Combined Fuel Economy E5 EM-iNot Officially Disclosed T60 Double Cab10.75 km/l
Ground Clearance E5 EM-i172 mm T60 Double Cab215 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Geely E5 EM-i

Apex

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

LDV T60 Double Cab

T60 Max Luxe 4WD Double Cab 6-Speed Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

E5 EM-i

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

T60 Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

E5 EM-i

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

T60 Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec E5 EM-i T60 Double Cab
Model Introduced Year 2025 2024
Generation Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published Current South African T60 Double Cab generation.
Facelift History No applicable South African facelift history established No later South African facelift is published.
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2024
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable Current
Body Style SUV Five-seat double-cab pickup
Model Year 2026 2024
Production Status active active
Segment Passenger vehicle Pickup
Vehicle Type SUV Pickup
Spec E5 EM-i T60 Double Cab
Length 4740 mm 5365 mm
Width 1905 mm 1900 mm
Height 1685 mm 1809 mm
Wheelbase 2755 mm 3155 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 172 mm 215 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 73 l
Boot/Cargo Space 528 l 1190 l
Kerb Weight 1770 kg 2075 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 3050 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 975 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 3000 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed 2 rows
Doors Not Officially Disclosed 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 6.3 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 965 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1045 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 880 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This E5 EM-i and T60 Double Cab comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: E5 EM-i 39 vs T60 Double Cab 82.

Efficiency index: E5 EM-i 79 vs T60 Double Cab 44.

Safety-equipment index: E5 EM-i 91 vs T60 Double Cab 87.

Practicality index: E5 EM-i 71 vs T60 Double Cab 87.

Ownership-cover index: E5 EM-i not separately scored vs T60 Double Cab not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

T60 Double Cab leads by 8 points

T60 Double Cab has a modest catalogue-index lead, while E5 EM-i remains close.

Evidence leader 77 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 73% source coverage
77
#1 Evidence leader

T60 Double Cab

73% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Efficiency 44
Performance 82
Efficiency 44
Safety 87
Practicality 87
Leads by 8 points
69
#2

E5 EM-i

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 79
Safety 91
Practicality 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance T60 Double Cab +43 Efficiency E5 EM-i +35 Safety E5 EM-i +4 Practicality T60 Double Cab +16

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

T60 Double Cab

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 44/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 87/100

E5 EM-i

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index LDV T60 Double Cab leads the specification evidence index with 77 pts vs 69 pts for E5 EM-i

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, T60 Double Cab leads. However, E5 EM-i may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
C7
C7
E5 EM-i vs C7 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
CX-30
CX-30
E5 EM-i vs CX-30 →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Eclipse Cross
Eclipse Cross
E5 EM-i vs Eclipse Cross →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Territory
Territory
E5 EM-i vs Territory →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
D-Max Extended Cab
D-Max Extended Cab
E5 EM-i vs D-Max Extended Cab →
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
VS
Harrier
Harrier
E5 EM-i vs Harrier →
T60 Double Cab
T60 Double Cab
VS
C7
C7
T60 Double Cab vs C7 →
T60 Double Cab
T60 Double Cab
VS
CX-30
CX-30
T60 Double Cab vs CX-30 →

E5 EM-i vs T60 Double Cab questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.