Isuzu D-Max Double Cab vs GWM ORA 5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Isuzu D-Max Double Cab in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Double Cab

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 900,310 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
VS
GWM ORA 5 in South Africa

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury Electric Current
ZAR 599,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 260 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Isuzu D-Max Double Cab vs GWM ORA 5: the short answer

ORA 5 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while D-Max Double Cab remains close.

ORA 5 starts ZAR 209,110 cheaper D-Max Double Cab from ZAR 574,010 · ORA 5 from ZAR 364,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification D-Max Double Cab ORA 5
Maximum Power D-Max Double Cab110 kW @ 3600 rpm ORA 5150 kW
Maximum Torque D-Max Double Cab350 Nm ORA 5260 Nm
Engine Size D-Max Double Cab3000 cc ORA 5Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy D-Max Double Cab12.3 km/l ORA 5Not Applicable
Ground Clearance D-Max Double Cab232 mm ORA 5175 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Isuzu D-Max Double Cab

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

GWM ORA 5

BEV Ultra Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

D-Max Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

ORA 5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Double Cab

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

ORA 5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec D-Max Double Cab ORA 5
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed 2026
Generation Current South African D-Max Double Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. First-generation ORA 5; South African launch specification
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. No facelift; first South African model year
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Not Applicable
Facelift Version Ending Current Not Applicable
Body Style Double Cab pickup Compact SUV
Body Type Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name -
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT -
Gross Combined Mass Kg 6000 kg -
Model Year MY26 2026
Production Status active On sale
Segment Pickup Compact SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2070 kg -
Vehicle Type Pickup Passenger vehicle
Spec D-Max Double Cab ORA 5
Length 5333 mm 4471 mm
Width 1880 mm 1833 mm
Height 1805 mm 1641 mm
Wheelbase 3125 mm 2720 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 232 mm 175 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 220 mm 115 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l 228 l
Kerb Weight 2070 kg 1555 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3100 kg 1970 kg
Payload Capacity 970 kg 415 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 12.5 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1005 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 975 mm 960 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This D-Max Double Cab and ORA 5 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: D-Max Double Cab 64 vs ORA 5 56.

Efficiency index: D-Max Double Cab 49 vs ORA 5 90.

Safety-equipment index: D-Max Double Cab 44 vs ORA 5 88.

Practicality index: D-Max Double Cab 91 vs ORA 5 54.

Ownership-cover index: D-Max Double Cab not separately scored vs ORA 5 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

ORA 5 leads by 8 points

ORA 5 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while D-Max Double Cab remains close.

Evidence leader 71 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 62% source coverage
71
#1 Evidence leader

ORA 5

62% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 90 Check Practicality 54
Performance 56
Efficiency 90
Safety 88
Practicality 54
Leads by 8 points
63
#2

D-Max Double Cab

75% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 91 Check Safety 44
Performance 64
Efficiency 49
Safety 44
Practicality 91
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance D-Max Double Cab +8 Efficiency ORA 5 +41 Safety ORA 5 +44 Practicality D-Max Double Cab +37

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

ORA 5

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 54/100

D-Max Double Cab

Performance 64/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 44/100
Practicality 91/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM ORA 5 leads the specification evidence index with 71 pts vs 63 pts for D-Max Double Cab

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, ORA 5 leads. However, D-Max Double Cab may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
D-Max Double Cab vs C5 SHS →
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
VS
D-Max Single Cab
D-Max Single Cab
D-Max Double Cab vs D-Max Single Cab →
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
VS
S6 Mining
S6 Mining
D-Max Double Cab vs S6 Mining →
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
VS
T60 Double Cab
T60 Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab vs T60 Double Cab →
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
VS
X70 Plus
X70 Plus
D-Max Double Cab vs X70 Plus →
D-Max Double Cab
D-Max Double Cab
VS
Outlander Sport
Outlander Sport
D-Max Double Cab vs Outlander Sport →
ORA 5
ORA 5
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
ORA 5 vs C5 SHS →
ORA 5
ORA 5
VS
D-Max Single Cab
D-Max Single Cab
ORA 5 vs D-Max Single Cab →

D-Max Double Cab vs ORA 5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.