Isuzu D-Max vs Isuzu D-Max Double Cab

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Isuzu D-Max
Isuzu D-Max in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max

Archive reference
No longer sold new historical model
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
VS
Isuzu D-Max Double Cab in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Double Cab

3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 900,310 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 350 @ 1800-2600 Nm ⛽ 12.3 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance D-Max Double Cab
Fuel Economy D-Max
🛡 Safety D-Max Double Cab
📦 Practicality D-Max Double Cab
🔑 Ownership D-Max

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec D-Max D-Max Double Cab
Engine Power Not confirmed 110 @ 3600
Torque Not confirmed 350 @ 1800-2600
Engine Size Not confirmed 3000
Claimed Mileage Not confirmed 12.3
Ground Clearance Not confirmed 232
Boot Space Not confirmed Not Applicable
Airbags Not confirmed Not Available
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 2070
Seating Capacity Not confirmed 5
Warranty Not confirmed 5 years / 120 000 km

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

D-Max Double Cab holds a noticeable edge over D-Max, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance D-Max Double Cab +12 pts
Efficiency D-Max +1 pts
Safety D-Max Double Cab +38 pts
Practicality D-Max Double Cab +35 pts
Ownership D-Max +2 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

D-Max

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

D-Max Double Cab

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

D-Max Double Cab

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec D-Max D-Max Double Cab
Model Introduced Year Not confirmed Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Not confirmed Current South African D-Max Double Cab listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Not confirmed Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Double Cab pickup
Body Type Cab Not confirmed Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note Not confirmed Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0 DDi Double Cab 4x4 LSE AT
Model Year Not confirmed MY26
Production Status Not confirmed published
Segment Not confirmed Pickup
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Pickup
Spec D-Max D-Max Double Cab
Ground Clearance Not confirmed 232 mm
Wheelbase Not confirmed 3125 mm
Length Not confirmed 5333 mm
Width Not confirmed 1880 mm
Height Not confirmed 1805 mm
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 2070 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight Not confirmed 3100 kg
Seating Capacity Not confirmed 5
Boot Space Not confirmed Not Applicable
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 3500 kg
Front Track Width Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Track Width Not confirmed Not Applicable
Turning Radius Not confirmed 12.5 m
Load Bed Length Not confirmed 1495 mm
Load Bed Width Not confirmed 1530 mm
Front Legroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Legroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Headroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Headroom Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Shoulder Room Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Shoulder Room Not confirmed Not Applicable
Boot Space Seats Folded Not confirmed Not Applicable
Number of Doors Not confirmed 4
Max Payload Not confirmed 970 kg
Boot Volume Not confirmed Not Applicable
Doors Not confirmed 4
Seats Not confirmed 5
Fuel Tank Capacity Not confirmed 76 l
Gross Combined Mass Kg Not confirmed 6000 kg
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg Not confirmed 3100 kg
Ground Clearance Max Not confirmed 232 mm
Ground Clearance Min Not confirmed 232 mm
Ground Clearance Mm Not confirmed 232 mm
Height Mm Not confirmed 1805 mm
Length Mm Not confirmed 5333 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Not confirmed 1495 mm
Loadbox Width Mm Not confirmed 1530 mm
Payload Kg Not confirmed 970 kg
Cargo Volume Not confirmed Not Applicable
Rear Overhang Mm Not confirmed 1318 mm
Tare Mass Kg Not confirmed 2070 kg
Track Front Rear Mm Not confirmed 1570/1570
Turning Circle Not confirmed 12.5 m
Turning Circle M Not confirmed 12.5 m
Width Mm Not confirmed 1880 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

D-Max Double Cab leads by 18 points

D-Max Double Cab holds a noticeable edge over D-Max, especially in key ownership areas.

Winner 57 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 79% confidence
57
#1 Winner

D-Max Double Cab

79% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 85 Check Safety 38
Performance 62
Efficiency 49
Safety 38
Practicality 85
Ownership 48
Leads by 18 points
39
#2

D-Max

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance D-Max Double Cab +12 Efficiency D-Max +1 Safety D-Max Double Cab +38 Practicality D-Max Double Cab +35 Ownership D-Max +2

Moderate difference between the models.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

D-Max Double Cab

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 38/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 48/100

D-Max

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Isuzu D-Max Double Cab wins with 57 pts vs 39 pts for D-Max

In structured scoring, D-Max Double Cab emerges as the stronger overall package. However, D-Max may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the D-Max Double Cab edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: D-Max 50 vs D-Max Double Cab 49. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: D-Max 0, D-Max Double Cab 38. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: D-Max 50, D-Max Double Cab 48. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: D-Max 50, D-Max Double Cab 85. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: D-Max 50, D-Max Double Cab 62. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The D-Max Double Cab edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The D-Max Double Cab scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between D-Max and D-Max Double Cab in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: D-Max scores 50 vs 62.

Efficiency: D-Max scores 50 vs 49.

Safety: D-Max scores 0 vs 38.

Practicality: D-Max scores 50 vs 85.

Ownership: D-Max scores 50 vs 48.

Final structured scoring gives D-Max Double Cab the advantage in this comparison.