Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs BYD SEALION 7

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,211,910 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 450 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
BYD SEALION 7 in South Africa

BYD SEALION 7

Performance EV AWD 4.5S Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,319,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 390 kW 🔧 690 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs BYD SEALION 7: the short answer

SEALION 7 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 remains close.

SEALION 7 starts ZAR 102,010 cheaper D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 from ZAR 1,211,910 · SEALION 7 from ZAR 1,109,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 SEALION 7
Maximum Power D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35140 kW @ 3600 rpm SEALION 7390 kW
Maximum Torque D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35450 Nm SEALION 7690 Nm
Engine Size D-Max Arctic Trucks AT352999 cc SEALION 7Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy D-Max Arctic Trucks AT3511.8 km/l SEALION 7Not Applicable
Ground Clearance D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35266 mm SEALION 7163 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BYD SEALION 7

Performance EV AWD 4.5S

Hagalu editorial rating
4.4/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

SEALION 7

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

SEALION 7

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 SEALION 7
Model Introduced Year 2023 2025
Generation Seventh-generation D-Max; MY26 facelift; AT35 conversion First South African SEALION 7 generation
Facelift History MY26 mid-cycle facelift announced 3 June 2026 No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026
Facelift Launched Since June 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg 5780 kg -
Model Year MY26 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment Extreme-terrain lifestyle pickup Medium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2160 kg -
Vehicle Type Light commercial vehicle Passenger vehicle
Model Code M260RY7 -
Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 SEALION 7
Length 5333 mm 4830 mm
Width 2040 mm 1925 mm
Height 1875 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase 3125 mm 2930 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 266 mm 163 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 220 mm 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l 500 l
Kerb Weight 2200 kg 2340 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2880 kg 2750 kg
Payload Capacity 660 kg 410 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.25 m 5.85 m
Front Headroom 1005 mm 980 mm
Rear Headroom 900 mm 940 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1100 mm
Rear Legroom 700 mm 820 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and SEALION 7 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 75 vs SEALION 7 100.

Efficiency index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 47 vs SEALION 7 90.

Safety-equipment index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 94 vs SEALION 7 99.

Practicality index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 88 vs SEALION 7 62.

Ownership-cover index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 not separately scored vs SEALION 7 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

SEALION 7 leads by 10 points

SEALION 7 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 remains close.

Evidence leader 88 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 69% source coverage
88
#1 Evidence leader

SEALION 7

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 62
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 99
Practicality 62
Leads by 10 points
78
#2

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

74% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 94
Practicality 88
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance SEALION 7 +25 Efficiency SEALION 7 +43 Safety SEALION 7 +5 Practicality D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +26

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

SEALION 7

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 62/100

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 88/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BYD SEALION 7 leads the specification evidence index with 88 pts vs 78 pts for D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, SEALION 7 leads. However, D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs SEALION 7 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.