Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,211,910 ex-showroom
⚡ 140 kW 🔧 450 Nm ⛽ 11.8 km/l
VS
Mercedes-Benz GLA in South Africa

Mercedes-Benz GLA

GLA 200 Petrol Mild Hybrid 8-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 901,887 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 270 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Mercedes-Benz GLA: the short answer

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GLA remains close.

GLA starts ZAR 310,023 cheaper D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 from ZAR 1,211,910 · GLA from ZAR 901,887

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 GLA
Maximum Power D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35140 kW @ 3600 rpm GLA120 kW
Maximum Torque D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35450 Nm GLA270 Nm
Engine Size D-Max Arctic Trucks AT352999 cc GLA1332 cc
Combined Fuel Economy D-Max Arctic Trucks AT3511.8 km/l GLA15.2 km/l
Ground Clearance D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35266 mm GLA143 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Arctic Trucks AT35 A/T

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mercedes-Benz GLA

GLA 200

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

GLA

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

GLA

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 GLA
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation Seventh-generation D-Max; MY26 facelift; AT35 conversion Current South African GLA generation represented by derivative GLA 200
Facelift History MY26 mid-cycle facelift announced 3 June 2026 Current-generation/facelift specification; derivative-specific South African configuration
Facelift Launched Since June 2026 Current South African model cycle
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Double-cab pickup Suv
Gross Combined Mass Kg 5780 kg -
Model Year MY26 2026
Production Status active Current South African retail range
Segment Extreme-terrain lifestyle pickup Premium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 2160 kg -
Vehicle Type Light commercial vehicle SUV
Model Code M260RY7 -
Spec D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 GLA
Length 5333 mm 4412 mm
Width 2040 mm 1834 mm
Height 1875 mm 1616 mm
Wheelbase 3125 mm 2729 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 266 mm 143 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 220 mm 220 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 l 43 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l 435 l
Kerb Weight 2200 kg 1650 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2880 kg 2000 kg
Payload Capacity 660 kg 550 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 2000 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.25 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 1005 mm 960 mm
Rear Headroom 900 mm 960 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 900 mm
Rear Legroom 700 mm 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 and GLA comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 75 vs GLA 54.

Efficiency index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 47 vs GLA 63.

Safety-equipment index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 94 vs GLA 99.

Practicality index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 88 vs GLA 62.

Ownership-cover index: D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 not separately scored vs GLA not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads by 8 points

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while GLA remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 74% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

74% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 75
Efficiency 47
Safety 94
Practicality 88
Leads by 8 points
70
#2

GLA

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Performance 54
Performance 54
Efficiency 63
Safety 99
Practicality 62
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +21 Efficiency GLA +16 Safety GLA +5 Practicality D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 +26

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 88/100

GLA

Performance 54/100
Efficiency 63/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 62/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Isuzu D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 70 pts for GLA

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 leads. However, GLA may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs ATTO 8 →
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
VS
X3
X3
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs X3 →
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
VS
GLC
GLC
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs GLC →
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
VS
NX
NX
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs NX →
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
VS
Ranger Tremor
Ranger Tremor
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs Ranger Tremor →
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs SEALION 7 →
GLA
GLA
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
GLA vs ATTO 8 →
GLA
GLA
VS
X3
X3
GLA vs X3 →

D-Max Arctic Trucks AT35 vs GLA questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.