Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Trafic Passenger

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Renault Trafic Passenger in South Africa

Renault Trafic Passenger

Techno+ Diesel 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,049,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Trafic Passenger: the short answer

CX-60 and Trafic Passenger are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

CX-60 starts ZAR 189,799 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · Trafic Passenger from ZAR 979,999

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 Trafic Passenger
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm Trafic Passenger125 kW @ 3500 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm Trafic Passenger380 Nm @ 1500 rpm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc Trafic Passenger1997 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l Trafic Passenger13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm Trafic Passenger199 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Renault Trafic Passenger

Techno+

Hagalu editorial rating
4.4/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

Trafic Passenger

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Trafic Passenger

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 Trafic Passenger
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Current long-wheelbase nine-seat Trafic Passenger introduced to the South African retail range in 2026 with 125 kW Blue dCi power and EAG9 automatic transmission
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Current Trafic face and smart-cockpit specification with three South African grades: Evolution, Evolution+ and Techno+
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV MPV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Large MPV
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV MPV
Spec CX-60 Trafic Passenger
Length 4745 mm 5480 mm
Width 1890 mm 1956 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1973 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 3498 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 199 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l 1890 l
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 2160 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg 3070 kg
Payload Capacity 872 kg 910 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 9 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m 6.9 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1028 mm
Rear Legroom 990 mm 930 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 160 mm
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Front Headroom - 1019 mm
Rear Headroom - 1060 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and Trafic Passenger comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs Trafic Passenger 55.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs Trafic Passenger 55.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs Trafic Passenger 90.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs Trafic Passenger 88.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs Trafic Passenger not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Trafic Passenger leads by 3 points

CX-60 and Trafic Passenger are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 81% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

Trafic Passenger

81% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Performance 55
Performance 55
Efficiency 55
Safety 90
Practicality 88
Leads by 3 points
70
#2

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +4 Efficiency Trafic Passenger +4 Safety CX-60 +8 Practicality Trafic Passenger +20

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Trafic Passenger

Performance 55/100
Efficiency 55/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 88/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Renault Trafic Passenger leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 70 pts for CX-60

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Trafic Passenger leads. However, CX-60 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-60
CX-60
VS
X2
X2
CX-60 vs X2 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
D90
D90
CX-60 vs D90 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
GLA
GLA
CX-60 vs GLA →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
CX-60 vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Everest
Everest
CX-60 vs Everest →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
UX
UX
CX-60 vs UX →
Trafic Passenger
Trafic Passenger
VS
X2
X2
Trafic Passenger vs X2 →
Trafic Passenger
Trafic Passenger
VS
D90
D90
Trafic Passenger vs D90 →

CX-60 vs Trafic Passenger questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.