Mazda CX-60 vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol Automatic
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

PHEV Apex Plug-In Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 729,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance CX-60
Fuel Economy Tiggo 8 PHEV
🛡 Safety CX-60
📦 Practicality Tiggo 8 PHEV
🔑 Ownership Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV starts ZAR 790200 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · Tiggo 8 PHEV from ZAR 729,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec CX-60 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Engine Power 141 kW 150 kW
Torque 261 Nm 230 Nm
Engine Size 2488 cc 1.5 cc
Claimed Mileage 13.0 km/l 19.2 km/l
Ground Clearance 178.8 mm 170 mm
Boot / Load Bay 477 l 494 l
Airbags 7 Multiple airbags
Kerb Weight 1470 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 7
Warranty 5 Years/Unlimited km 7 Year / 200 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Both CX-60 and Tiggo 8 PHEV are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance CX-60 +3 pts
Efficiency Tiggo 8 PHEV +30 pts
Safety CX-60 +5 pts
Practicality Tiggo 8 PHEV +10 pts
Ownership Tiggo 8 PHEV +14 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

Tiggo 8 PHEV

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Current South Africa Tiggo 8 PHEV range
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-60 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Ground Clearance 178.8 mm 170 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 2710 mm
Length 4745 mm 4725 mm
Width 1890 mm 1860 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1705 mm
Kerb Weight 1470 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight 2342 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 477 l 494 l
Towing Capacity 1500 kg -
Turning Radius 5.85 m -
Load Bed Length 477 l 494 l
Load Bed Width - -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 990 mm -
Front Shoulder Room 1504 mm -
Rear Shoulder Room 1441 mm -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1148 l 1930 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Max Payload 872 kg -
Boot Volume 477 l 494 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 7
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 60 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg 2342 kg -
Ground Clearance Max 178.8 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance Min 178.8 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 178.8 mm 170 mm
Height Mm 1687.5 mm 1705 mm
Length Mm 4745 mm 4725 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 477 l 494 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Payload Kg 872 kg -
Cargo Volume 477 l 494 l
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg -
Turning Circle 5.85 m -
Turning Circle M 5.85 m -
Width Mm 1890 mm 1860 mm
Front Track Width - -
Rear Track Width - -
Front Headroom - -
Rear Headroom - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tiggo 8 PHEV leads by 7 points

Both CX-60 and Tiggo 8 PHEV are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 75 /100
Lead 7 points
Data 74% confidence
75
#1 Winner

Tiggo 8 PHEV

74% data confidence 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 56
Performance 56
Efficiency 81
Safety 94
Practicality 78
Ownership 69
Leads by 7 points
68
#2

CX-60

94% data confidence 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 99
Practicality 68
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +3 Efficiency Tiggo 8 PHEV +30 Safety CX-60 +5 Practicality Tiggo 8 PHEV +10 Ownership Tiggo 8 PHEV +14

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 81/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 69/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 68/100
Ownership 55/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV wins with 75 pts vs 68 pts for CX-60

In structured scoring, Tiggo 8 PHEV emerges as the stronger overall package. However, CX-60 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tiggo 8 PHEV edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: CX-60 51 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 81. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: CX-60 99, Tiggo 8 PHEV 94. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: CX-60 55, Tiggo 8 PHEV 69. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: CX-60 68, Tiggo 8 PHEV 78. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: CX-60 59, Tiggo 8 PHEV 56. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tiggo 8 PHEV edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tiggo 8 PHEV scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between CX-60 and Tiggo 8 PHEV in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: CX-60 scores 59 vs 56.

Efficiency: CX-60 scores 51 vs 81.

Safety: CX-60 scores 99 vs 94.

Practicality: CX-60 scores 68 vs 78.

Ownership: CX-60 scores 55 vs 69.

Final structured scoring gives Tiggo 8 PHEV the advantage in this comparison.