Leapmotor C10 REEV vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Leapmotor C10 REEV in South Africa

Leapmotor C10 REEV

Design Plug-in Hybrid Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 158 kW 🔧 320 Nm ⛽ 17.0 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

PHEV Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 729,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Leapmotor C10 REEV vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV: the short answer

C10 REEV and Tiggo 8 PHEV are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Tiggo 8 PHEV starts ZAR 30,000 cheaper C10 REEV from ZAR 759,900 · Tiggo 8 PHEV from ZAR 729,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C10 REEV Tiggo 8 PHEV
Maximum Power C10 REEV158 kW Tiggo 8 PHEV150 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque C10 REEV320 Nm Tiggo 8 PHEV230 Nm
Engine Size C10 REEV1500 cc Tiggo 8 PHEV1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C10 REEV17.0 km/l Tiggo 8 PHEV19.2 km/l
Ground Clearance C10 REEV180 mm Tiggo 8 PHEV170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C10 REEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C10 REEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Tiggo 8 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C10 REEV Tiggo 8 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2025 2026
Generation First-generation Leapmotor C10 range-extended electric SUV Current South Africa Tiggo 8 PHEV range
Facelift History The C10 REEV launched in South Africa in October 2025 as Leapmotor's first local model. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment D-segment family SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1980 kg 1907 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec C10 REEV Tiggo 8 PHEV
Length 4739 mm 4725 mm
Width 1900 mm 1860 mm
Height 1680 mm 1705 mm
Wheelbase 2825 mm 2710 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 400 l 494 l
Kerb Weight 1980 kg 1907 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2425 kg 2430 kg
Payload Capacity 445 kg 523 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 1020 mm
Rear Headroom 985 mm 985 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1055 mm
Rear Legroom 950 mm 945 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C10 REEV and Tiggo 8 PHEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C10 REEV 65 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 56.

Efficiency index: C10 REEV 75 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 81.

Safety-equipment index: C10 REEV 99 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: C10 REEV 59 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 70.

Ownership-cover index: C10 REEV not separately scored vs Tiggo 8 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C10 REEV leads by 0 points

C10 REEV and Tiggo 8 PHEV are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 74 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 83% source coverage
74
#1 Evidence leader

C10 REEV

83% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Practicality 59
Performance 65
Efficiency 75
Safety 99
Practicality 59
Leads by 0 points
74
#2

Tiggo 8 PHEV

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 56
Performance 56
Efficiency 81
Safety 94
Practicality 70
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C10 REEV +9 Efficiency Tiggo 8 PHEV +6 Safety C10 REEV +5 Practicality Tiggo 8 PHEV +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C10 REEV

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 75/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 59/100

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 81/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 70/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Leapmotor C10 REEV leads the specification evidence index with 74 pts vs 74 pts for Tiggo 8 PHEV

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C10 REEV leads. However, Tiggo 8 PHEV may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

C10 REEV vs Tiggo 8 PHEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.