Mazda CX-60 vs Isuzu D-Max X-Rider

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
VS
Isuzu D-Max X-Rider in South Africa

Isuzu D-Max X-Rider

1.9 DDi Double Cab X-Rider 4x2 AT Diesel 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 690,810 ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 350 Nm ⛽ 13.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-60 vs Isuzu D-Max X-Rider: the short answer

CX-60 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while D-Max X-Rider remains close.

D-Max X-Rider starts ZAR 121,210 cheaper CX-60 from ZAR 790,200 · D-Max X-Rider from ZAR 668,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-60 D-Max X-Rider
Maximum Power CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm D-Max X-Rider110 kW @ 3600 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm D-Max X-Rider350 Nm
Engine Size CX-602488 cc D-Max X-Rider1900 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-6013.0 km/l D-Max X-Rider13.5 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-60178.8 mm D-Max X-Rider227 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Isuzu D-Max X-Rider

1.9 DDi Double Cab X-Rider 4x2 AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

D-Max X-Rider

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

D-Max X-Rider

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-60 D-Max X-Rider
Model Introduced Year 2023 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture Current South African D-Max X-Rider listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Double Cab pickup
Model Year 2026 MY26
Production Status Active active
Segment Premium mid-size SUV Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 1470 kg 1845 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Pickup
Body Type Cab - Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 1.9 DDi Double Cab X-Rider 4x2 AT
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 5000 kg
Spec CX-60 D-Max X-Rider
Length 4745 mm 5265 mm
Width 1890 mm 1870 mm
Height 1687.5 mm 1805 mm
Wheelbase 2870 mm 3125 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 178.8 mm 227 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 58 l 76 l
Boot/Cargo Space 477 l 1000 l
Kerb Weight 1470 kg 1845 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2342 kg 3000 kg
Payload Capacity 872 kg 1095 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 2100 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.85 m 12.5 m
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 990 mm 700 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 220 mm
Number of Rows - 1 rows
Front Headroom - 1005 mm
Rear Headroom - 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-60 and D-Max X-Rider comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-60 59 vs D-Max X-Rider 61.

Efficiency index: CX-60 51 vs D-Max X-Rider 53.

Safety-equipment index: CX-60 98 vs D-Max X-Rider 40.

Practicality index: CX-60 68 vs D-Max X-Rider 85.

Ownership-cover index: CX-60 not separately scored vs D-Max X-Rider not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-60 leads by 10 points

CX-60 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while D-Max X-Rider remains close.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 10 points
60
#2

D-Max X-Rider

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 85 Check Safety 40
Performance 61
Efficiency 53
Safety 40
Practicality 85
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance D-Max X-Rider +2 Efficiency D-Max X-Rider +2 Safety CX-60 +58 Practicality D-Max X-Rider +17

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

D-Max X-Rider

Performance 61/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 40/100
Practicality 85/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-60 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 60 pts for D-Max X-Rider

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-60 leads. However, D-Max X-Rider may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
CX-60 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tunland V9 Double Cab
Tunland V9 Double Cab
CX-60 vs Tunland V9 Double Cab →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Ranger Sport
Ranger Sport
CX-60 vs Ranger Sport →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
CX-60 vs Land Cruiser FJ →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
RD6
RD6
CX-60 vs RD6 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
MU-X
MU-X
CX-60 vs MU-X →
D-Max X-Rider
D-Max X-Rider
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
D-Max X-Rider vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
D-Max X-Rider
D-Max X-Rider
VS
Tunland V9 Double Cab
Tunland V9 Double Cab
D-Max X-Rider vs Tunland V9 Double Cab →

CX-60 vs D-Max X-Rider questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.