Mazda CX-5 vs MG ZS

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
MG ZS in South Africa

MG ZS

1.5L 4AT Luxury Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 309,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 84 kW 🔧 150 Nm ⛽ 14.08 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs MG ZS: the short answer

CX-5 and ZS are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

ZS starts ZAR 280,600 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · ZS from ZAR 289,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 ZS
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm ZS84 kW
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm ZS150 Nm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc ZS1498 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l ZS14.08 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm ZS175 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CX-5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

ZS

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

ZS

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 ZS
Model Introduced Year 2017 2025
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Current local value-positioned ZS compact SUV, sold alongside rather than replaced by the larger turbocharged ZS Pro.
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Current South African ZS specification introduced with MG's market return in 2025.
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Five-door compact SUV
Model Year 2026 2024
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV Compact SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg -
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-5 ZS
Length 4575 mm 4314 mm
Width 1845 mm 1809 mm
Height 1680 mm 1624 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2585 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 175 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 48 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 359 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1258 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 1695 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 437 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.6 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1070 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 850 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - Not Officially Disclosed
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1043 mm
Rear Headroom - 995 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and ZS comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs ZS 37.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs ZS 55.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs ZS 87.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs ZS 52.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs ZS not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-5 leads by 6 points

CX-5 and ZS are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 63 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 78% source coverage
63
#1 Evidence leader

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Leads by 6 points
57
#2

ZS

73% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 37
Performance 37
Efficiency 55
Safety 87
Practicality 52
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-5 +11 Efficiency CX-5 +1 Safety CX-5 +1 Practicality CX-5 +9

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

ZS

Performance 37/100
Efficiency 55/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 52/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 63 pts vs 57 pts for ZS

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-5 leads. However, ZS may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
X55 Plus
X55 Plus
CX-5 vs X55 Plus →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
CX-5 vs Tiggo 7 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
CS75 Pro
CS75 Pro
CX-5 vs CS75 Pro →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jolion Pro Limited
Jolion Pro Limited
CX-5 vs Jolion Pro Limited →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Corolla Cross
Corolla Cross
CX-5 vs Corolla Cross →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Jimny 5-Door
Jimny 5-Door
CX-5 vs Jimny 5-Door →
ZS
ZS
VS
X55 Plus
X55 Plus
ZS vs X55 Plus →
ZS
ZS
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
ZS vs Tiggo 7 →

CX-5 vs ZS questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.