Mazda CX-5 vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

PHEV Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 729,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV: the short answer

Tiggo 8 PHEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-5 remains close.

CX-5 starts ZAR 159,400 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · Tiggo 8 PHEV from ZAR 729,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm Tiggo 8 PHEV150 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm Tiggo 8 PHEV230 Nm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc Tiggo 8 PHEV1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l Tiggo 8 PHEV19.2 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm Tiggo 8 PHEV170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Tiggo 8 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2017 2026
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Current South Africa Tiggo 8 PHEV range
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2017 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1907 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CX-5 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Length 4575 mm 4725 mm
Width 1845 mm 1860 mm
Height 1680 mm 1705 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2710 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 494 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1907 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 2430 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 523 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.6 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1055 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 945 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 190 mm
Number of Rows - 3 rows
Front Headroom - 1020 mm
Rear Headroom - 985 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and Tiggo 8 PHEV comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 56.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 81.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 70.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs Tiggo 8 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 8 PHEV leads by 11 points

Tiggo 8 PHEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while CX-5 remains close.

Evidence leader 74 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 69% source coverage
74
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 8 PHEV

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 56
Performance 56
Efficiency 81
Safety 94
Practicality 70
Leads by 11 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 8 PHEV +8 Efficiency Tiggo 8 PHEV +25 Safety Tiggo 8 PHEV +6 Practicality Tiggo 8 PHEV +9

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 81/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 70/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV leads the specification evidence index with 74 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 8 PHEV leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
H7
H7
CX-5 vs H7 →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
CX-5 vs T-Roc →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
CX-5 vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Sportage
Sportage
CX-5 vs Sportage →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
CX-5 vs Tiguan →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Fortuner
Fortuner
CX-5 vs Fortuner →
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
VS
H7
H7
Tiggo 8 PHEV vs H7 →
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
Tiggo 8 PHEV vs T-Roc →

CX-5 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.