Mazda CX-5 vs Honda Fit

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 688,400 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Honda Fit in South Africa

Honda Fit

1.5 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 380,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 109 kW 🔧 253 Nm ⛽ 26.3 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda CX-5 vs Honda Fit: the short answer

CX-5 and Fit are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Fit starts ZAR 190,000 cheaper CX-5 from ZAR 570,500 · Fit from ZAR 380,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CX-5 Fit
Maximum Power CX-5121 kW @ 6000 rpm Fit109 kW
Maximum Torque CX-5213 Nm @ 4000 rpm Fit253 Nm
Engine Size CX-51998 cc Fit1498 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CX-514.5 km/l Fit26.3 km/l
Ground Clearance CX-5200 mm Fit141 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mazda CX-5

2.0 Carbon Edition Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Honda Fit

1.5 Hybrid e:HEV

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

CX-5

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Fit

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Fit

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CX-5 Fit
Model Introduced Year 2017 2022
Generation Second-generation KF-series Mazda CX-5, current outgoing South African range Based on Honda’s global small car platform with focus on efficiency and space utilization
Facelift History The second generation arrived in 2017 and received a substantial update from 2021. An all-new replacement is scheduled to reach South Africa on 1 August 2026, while this current range remains on sale. Latest generation introduced with hybrid technology and updated design
Facelift Launched Since 2017 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Mid-size family SUV Hatchback
Tare Mass Kg 1575 kg 1209 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Hatchback
Color Note - White, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red
Dealer Stock Note - Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec CX-5 Fit
Length 4575 mm 3995 mm
Width 1845 mm 1695 mm
Height 1680 mm 1515 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2530 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 141 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 40 l
Boot/Cargo Space 438 l 304 l
Kerb Weight 1575 kg 1209 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2065 kg 1680 kg
Payload Capacity 490 kg 471 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 800 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.95 m 5.0 m
Front Legroom 1041 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 1007 mm 950 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 141 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1000 mm
Rear Headroom - 960 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CX-5 and Fit comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CX-5 48 vs Fit 48.

Efficiency index: CX-5 56 vs Fit 95.

Safety-equipment index: CX-5 88 vs Fit 91.

Practicality index: CX-5 61 vs Fit 49.

Ownership-cover index: CX-5 not separately scored vs Fit 60.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Fit leads by 4 points

CX-5 and Fit are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 94% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Fit

94% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 95 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 95
Safety 91
Practicality 49
Ownership 60
Leads by 4 points
63
#2

CX-5

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 48
Performance 48
Efficiency 56
Safety 88
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Level Efficiency Fit +39 Safety Fit +3 Practicality CX-5 +12

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Fit

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 95/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 49/100
Ownership 60/100

CX-5

Performance 48/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 61/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda Fit leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 63 pts for CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Fit leads. However, CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

CX-5
CX-5
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
CX-5 vs C5 SHS →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Swift Sport
Swift Sport
CX-5 vs Swift Sport →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
FRIDAY REEV
FRIDAY REEV
CX-5 vs FRIDAY REEV →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
HR-V
HR-V
CX-5 vs HR-V →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Destinator
Destinator
CX-5 vs Destinator →
CX-5
CX-5
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
CX-5 vs Scorpio-N →
Fit
Fit
VS
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
Fit vs C5 SHS →
Fit
Fit
VS
Swift Sport
Swift Sport
Fit vs Swift Sport →

CX-5 vs Fit questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.