Tata Curvv vs Mazda CX-30

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Tata Curvv in South Africa

Tata Curvv

1.2T Accomplished S DCA Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 88 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.39 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-30 in South Africa

Mazda CX-30

2.0 Individual Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 651,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 121 kW 🔧 213 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance CX-30
Fuel Economy Curvv
🛡 Safety CX-30
📦 Practicality Curvv
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
Curvv starts ZAR 189,900 cheaper Curvv from ZAR 349,900 · CX-30 from ZAR 539,800

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Curvv CX-30
Maximum Power 88 kW @ 5500 rpm 121 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 170 Nm @ 1750-4000 rpm 213 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size 1199 cc 1998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 16.39 km/l 15.2 km/l
Ground Clearance 208 mm 175 mm
Boot / Load Bay 500 l 295 l
Airbags 6 7
Kerb Weight 1378 kg 1340 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 years / 125,000 km 5 Years/Unlimited km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Curvv and CX-30 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance CX-30 +10 pts
Efficiency Curvv +4 pts
Safety CX-30 +10 pts
Practicality Curvv +6 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Curvv

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality
Catalogue-index leader

CX-30

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Curvv

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

CX-30

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Curvv CX-30
Model Introduced Year 2025 2021
Generation First-generation South African-market Tata Curvv coupé SUV First-generation DM-series Mazda CX-30 using seventh-generation Mazda architecture
Facelift History Introduced with Tata Passenger Vehicles' South African return in 2025; no South African facelift has been announced South African editions received a focused technology and equipment update in 2024, including the 10.25-inch display and revised connectivity.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2021
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Coupé SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active Active
Segment Mid-size coupé SUV Compact crossover
Vehicle Type Passenger Car SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1340 kg
Spec Curvv CX-30
Length 4308 mm 4395 mm
Width 1810 mm 1795 mm
Height 1635 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase 2560 mm 2655 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 208 mm 175 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 180 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 44 l 51 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 1378 kg 1340 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1788 kg 1937 kg
Payload Capacity 410 kg 597 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.35 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm -
Rear Headroom 910 mm -
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 880 mm 921 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

CX-30 leads by 3 points

Curvv and CX-30 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Index leader 65 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 78% source coverage
65
#1 Index leader

CX-30

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 96 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 59
Safety 96
Practicality 55
Leads by 3 points
62
#2

Curvv

73% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 86 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 63
Safety 86
Practicality 61
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-30 +10 Efficiency Curvv +4 Safety CX-30 +10 Practicality Curvv +6

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

CX-30

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 96/100
Practicality 55/100

Curvv

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 63/100
Safety 86/100
Practicality 61/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Mazda CX-30 leads the catalogue index with 65 pts vs 62 pts for Curvv

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, CX-30 leads. However, Curvv may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This Curvv and CX-30 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Curvv 39 vs CX-30 49.

Efficiency index: Curvv 63 vs CX-30 59.

Safety-equipment index: Curvv 86 vs CX-30 96.

Practicality index: Curvv 61 vs CX-30 55.

Ownership-cover index: Curvv not separately scored vs CX-30 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.