Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-60

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Honda CR-V in South Africa

Honda CR-V

2.0 Hybrid e:HEV Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 819,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 204 kW 🔧 335 Nm ⛽ 20 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-60: the short answer

CR-V and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

CR-V starts ZAR 100,300 cheaper CR-V from ZAR 689,900 · CX-60 from ZAR 790,200

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification CR-V CX-60
Maximum Power CR-V204 kW CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque CR-V335 Nm CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Engine Size CR-V1993 cc CX-602488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy CR-V20 km/l CX-6013.0 km/l
Ground Clearance CR-V198 mm CX-60178.8 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

CR-V

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

CX-60

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

CR-V

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec CR-V CX-60
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Built on Honda’s global SUV platform with focus on comfort and safety First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture
Facelift History Latest generation introduced with improved design, features, and safety technology Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Grey, Blue, Red -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment SUV Premium mid-size SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1750 kg 1470 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec CR-V CX-60
Length 4690 mm 4745 mm
Width 1860 mm 1890 mm
Height 1690 mm 1687.5 mm
Wheelbase 2700 mm 2870 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 198 mm 178.8 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 198 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 l 58 l
Boot/Cargo Space 497 l 477 l
Kerb Weight 1750 kg 1470 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 2342 kg
Payload Capacity 500 kg 872 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.85 m
Front Headroom 970 mm -
Rear Headroom 970 mm -
Front Legroom 1049 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 1041 mm 990 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This CR-V and CX-60 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: CR-V 77 vs CX-60 59.

Efficiency index: CR-V 80 vs CX-60 51.

Safety-equipment index: CR-V 91 vs CX-60 98.

Practicality index: CR-V 66 vs CX-60 68.

Ownership-cover index: CR-V 60 vs CX-60 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CR-V leads by 6 points

CR-V and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 94% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

CR-V

94% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Ownership 60
Performance 77
Efficiency 80
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Ownership 60
Leads by 6 points
70
#2

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CR-V +18 Efficiency CR-V +29 Safety CX-60 +7 Practicality CX-60 +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CR-V

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 80/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100
Ownership 60/100

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda CR-V leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 70 pts for CX-60

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CR-V leads. However, CX-60 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South African models and comparable body styles.

CR-V
CR-V
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
CR-V vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
MU-X
MU-X
CR-V vs MU-X →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
CR-V vs C10 REEV →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Outlander
Outlander
CR-V vs Outlander →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
CR-V vs Land Cruiser FJ →
CR-V
CR-V
VS
RAV4
RAV4
CR-V vs RAV4 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
CX-60 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
MU-X
MU-X
CX-60 vs MU-X →

CR-V vs CX-60 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.