Geely Coolray vs Ford EcoSport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford EcoSport Discontinued model
Geely Coolray in South Africa

Geely Coolray

Vertex Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 429,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 128 kW 🔧 290 Nm ⛽ 15.38 km/l
VS
Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 395,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 17.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Geely Coolray vs Ford EcoSport: the short answer

Coolray and EcoSport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context Coolray: current from ZAR 369,900 · EcoSport: last listed from ZAR 310,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Coolray EcoSport
Maximum Power Coolray128 kW EcoSport92 kW
Maximum Torque Coolray290 Nm EcoSport170 Nm
Engine Size CoolrayNot Officially Disclosed EcoSport998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Coolray15.38 km/l EcoSport17.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Coolray180 mm EcoSport200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Coolray

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance

EcoSport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Coolray

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

EcoSport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Coolray EcoSport
Model Introduced Year 2026 2013
Generation Current South African model / exact generation number not separately published Single generation on Ford B2E platform. Produced in India for global markets. SA received the facelift model with improved interior quality and revised safety kit.
Facelift History No applicable South African facelift history established Facelift in 2017 — revised front fascia and SYNC 3 infotainment introduced
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2017
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable 2024
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2021
Production Status active discontinued
Segment Passenger vehicle SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 1290 kg
Spec Coolray EcoSport
Length 4380 mm 4325 mm
Width 1795 mm 1765 mm
Height 1609 mm 1653 mm
Wheelbase 2600 mm 2519 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 52 l
Boot/Cargo Space 330 l 352 l
Kerb Weight 1815 kg 1290 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 1740 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 450 kg
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 950 kg
Seating Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed 2 rows
Doors Not Officially Disclosed 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius Not Officially Disclosed 5.6 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 953 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1032 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 890 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Coolray and EcoSport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Coolray 60 vs EcoSport 40.

Efficiency index: Coolray 61 vs EcoSport 65.

Safety-equipment index: Coolray 90 vs EcoSport 92.

Practicality index: Coolray 56 vs EcoSport 56.

Ownership-cover index: Coolray not separately scored vs EcoSport 55.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Coolray leads by 6 points

Coolray and EcoSport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 67% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Coolray

67% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Practicality 56
Performance 60
Efficiency 61
Safety 90
Practicality 56
Leads by 6 points
61
#2

EcoSport

92% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 65
Safety 92
Practicality 56
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Coolray +20 Efficiency EcoSport +4 Safety EcoSport +2 Practicality Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Coolray

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 56/100

EcoSport

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Geely Coolray leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 61 pts for EcoSport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Coolray leads. However, EcoSport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Coolray vs EcoSport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.