Omoda C5 vs Ford EcoSport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Ford EcoSport Discontinued model
Omoda C5 in South Africa

Omoda C5

Street Plus Petrol 6-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 339,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Ford EcoSport in South Africa

Ford EcoSport

1.0 EcoBoost Titanium Automatic Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 395,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 17.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C5 vs Ford EcoSport: the short answer

C5 and EcoSport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context C5: current from ZAR 339,900 · EcoSport: last listed from ZAR 310,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C5 EcoSport
Maximum Power C5115 kW @ 5500 rpm EcoSport92 kW
Maximum Torque C5230 Nm EcoSport170 Nm
Engine Size C51500 cc EcoSport998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C514.5 km/l EcoSport17.2 km/l
Ground Clearance C5169 mm EcoSport200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

EcoSport

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

C5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

EcoSport

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C5 EcoSport
Model Introduced Year 2023 2013
Generation Current South Africa C5 range Single generation on Ford B2E platform. Produced in India for global markets. SA received the facelift model with improved interior quality and revised safety kit.
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Facelift in 2017 — revised front fascia and SYNC 3 infotainment introduced
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2017
Facelift Version Ending Current 2024
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2021
Production Status active discontinued
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1381 kg 1290 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec C5 EcoSport
Length 4400 mm 4325 mm
Width 1830 mm 1765 mm
Height 1590 mm 1653 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 2519 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 145 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 52 l
Boot/Cargo Space 442 l 352 l
Kerb Weight 1381 kg 1290 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1856 kg 1740 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 450 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 950 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 953 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1032 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 890 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C5 and EcoSport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 51 vs EcoSport 40.

Efficiency index: C5 56 vs EcoSport 65.

Safety-equipment index: C5 91 vs EcoSport 92.

Practicality index: C5 59 vs EcoSport 56.

Ownership-cover index: C5 not separately scored vs EcoSport 55.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C5 leads by 3 points

C5 and EcoSport are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 64 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 69% source coverage
64
#1 Evidence leader

C5

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 59
Leads by 3 points
61
#2

EcoSport

92% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Performance 40
Performance 40
Efficiency 65
Safety 92
Practicality 56
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C5 +11 Efficiency EcoSport +9 Safety EcoSport +1 Practicality C5 +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C5

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 59/100

EcoSport

Performance 40/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 56/100
Ownership 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Omoda C5 leads the specification evidence index with 64 pts vs 61 pts for EcoSport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C5 leads. However, EcoSport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

C5 vs EcoSport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.