Honda Civic Type R vs BYD SHARK 6 DMO

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda Civic Type R in South Africa

Honda Civic Type R

2.0T Type R Manual Petrol 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 1,021,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 315 kW 🔧 420 Nm ⛽ 12 km/l
VS
BYD SHARK 6 DMO in South Africa

BYD SHARK 6 DMO

Performance DMO AWD Plug-in Hybrid e-CVT Current
ZAR 1,149,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 380 Nm ⛽ 9.5 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda Civic Type R vs BYD SHARK 6 DMO: the short answer

SHARK 6 DMO holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Civic Type R.

SHARK 6 DMO starts ZAR 31,700 cheaper Civic Type R from ZAR 1,021,600 · SHARK 6 DMO from ZAR 989,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Civic Type R SHARK 6 DMO
Maximum Power Civic Type R315 kW SHARK 6 DMO180 kW
Maximum Torque Civic Type R420 Nm SHARK 6 DMO380 Nm
Engine Size Civic Type R1996 cc SHARK 6 DMONot Officially Disclosed
Combined Fuel Economy Civic Type R12 km/l SHARK 6 DMO9.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Civic Type R130 mm SHARK 6 DMO230 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda Civic Type R

2.0T Type R Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

BYD SHARK 6 DMO

Performance DMO AWD

Hagalu editorial rating
4.4/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Civic Type R

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

SHARK 6 DMO

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Civic Type R

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

SHARK 6 DMO

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Civic Type R SHARK 6 DMO
Model Introduced Year 2023 2025
Generation 2.0L VTEC Turbo: 235 kW / 420 Nm. 0–100 km/h in 5.4 seconds. Top speed 275 km/h. 6-speed manual only — no automatic option. First South African SHARK 6 DMO generation
Facelift History FL5 generation launched globally in 2023 — sixth generation Type R. Major redesign from the aggressive FK8. Cleaner exterior with mature styling but improved performance. No separately marketed South African facelift announced as at August 2026
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan Double-cab Pickup
Color Note Sedan -
Dealer Stock Note Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment Sedan Double-cab Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 1430 kg -
Vehicle Type Sedan Light commercial vehicle
Spec Civic Type R SHARK 6 DMO
Length 4595 mm 5457 mm
Width 1890 mm 1971 mm
Height 1405 mm 1925 mm
Wheelbase 2735 mm 3260 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 130 mm 230 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 123 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 410 l 1200 l
Kerb Weight 1430 kg 2775 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1850 kg 3500 kg
Payload Capacity 420 kg 725 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 6.75 m
Front Headroom 998 mm 1025 mm
Rear Headroom 942 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 1074 mm 1048 mm
Rear Legroom 950 mm 880.4 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Civic Type R and SHARK 6 DMO comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Civic Type R 87 vs SHARK 6 DMO 82.

Efficiency index: Civic Type R 47 vs SHARK 6 DMO 53.

Safety-equipment index: Civic Type R 92 vs SHARK 6 DMO 99.

Practicality index: Civic Type R 53 vs SHARK 6 DMO 87.

Ownership-cover index: Civic Type R 43 vs SHARK 6 DMO not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

SHARK 6 DMO leads by 15 points

SHARK 6 DMO holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Civic Type R.

Evidence leader 82 /100
Lead 15 points
Data 83% source coverage
82
#1 Evidence leader

SHARK 6 DMO

83% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 99 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 82
Efficiency 53
Safety 99
Practicality 87
Leads by 15 points
67
#2

Civic Type R

87% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Ownership 43
Performance 87
Efficiency 47
Safety 92
Practicality 53
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Civic Type R +5 Efficiency SHARK 6 DMO +6 Safety SHARK 6 DMO +7 Practicality SHARK 6 DMO +34

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

SHARK 6 DMO

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 87/100

Civic Type R

Performance 87/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 53/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BYD SHARK 6 DMO leads the specification evidence index with 82 pts vs 67 pts for Civic Type R

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, SHARK 6 DMO leads. However, Civic Type R may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Civic Type R
Civic Type R
VS
SEAL
SEAL
Civic Type R vs SEAL →
Civic Type R
Civic Type R
VS
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
Civic Type R vs 4 Series Gran Coupé →
Civic Type R
Civic Type R
VS
Ranger Tremor
Ranger Tremor
Civic Type R vs Ranger Tremor →
Civic Type R
Civic Type R
VS
CLA Hybrid
CLA HybridUpcoming
Civic Type R vs CLA Hybrid →
Civic Type R
Civic Type R
VS
C-Class
C-Class
Civic Type R vs C-Class →
Civic Type R
Civic Type R
VS
3 Series
3 Series
Civic Type R vs 3 Series →
SHARK 6 DMO
SHARK 6 DMO
VS
SEAL
SEAL
SHARK 6 DMO vs SEAL →
SHARK 6 DMO
SHARK 6 DMO
VS
4 Series Gran Coupé
4 Series Gran Coupé
SHARK 6 DMO vs 4 Series Gran Coupé →

Civic Type R vs SHARK 6 DMO questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.