Honda Civic RS vs Mazda CX-3

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Honda Civic RS in South Africa

Honda Civic RS

1.5T RS CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 725,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 178 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-3 in South Africa

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 551,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 206 Nm ⛽ 15.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Honda Civic RS vs Mazda CX-3: the short answer

Civic RS and CX-3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

CX-3 starts ZAR 285,000 cheaper Civic RS from ZAR 725,000 · CX-3 from ZAR 440,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Civic RS CX-3
Maximum Power Civic RS178 kW CX-3115 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Civic RS240 Nm CX-3206 Nm @ 2800 rpm
Engine Size Civic RS1498 cc CX-31998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Civic RS16.1 km/l CX-315.9 km/l
Ground Clearance Civic RS134 mm CX-3155 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Honda Civic RS

1.5T RS CVT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Mazda CX-3

2.0 Individual Auto FWD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Civic RS

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

CX-3

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Civic RS

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

CX-3

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Civic RS CX-3
Model Introduced Year 2022 2015
Generation Based on 11th generation platform Current first-generation DK-series Mazda CX-3
Facelift History Introduced with latest Civic generation The CX-3 has received successive equipment and design updates since its 2015 debut; Carbon and Individual now sit together at the top of the South African range.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2015
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Color Note White, Black, Silver, Blue, Red, Grey -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment Sedan Compact crossover
Tare Mass Kg 1350 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Spec Civic RS CX-3
Length 4678 mm 4275 mm
Width 1802 mm 1765 mm
Height 1415 mm 1542 mm
Wheelbase 2735 mm 2570 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 134 mm 155 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 134 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 l 48 l
Boot/Cargo Space 495 l 230 l
Kerb Weight 1350 kg 1270 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg 1735 kg
Payload Capacity 430 kg 465 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 850 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 955 mm -
Rear Headroom 942 mm -
Front Legroom 1074 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 950 mm 888 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Civic RS and CX-3 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Civic RS 63 vs CX-3 47.

Efficiency index: Civic RS 63 vs CX-3 61.

Safety-equipment index: Civic RS 92 vs CX-3 84.

Practicality index: Civic RS 58 vs CX-3 48.

Ownership-cover index: Civic RS 43 vs CX-3 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Civic RS leads by 5 points

Civic RS and CX-3 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 65 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 91% source coverage
65
#1 Evidence leader

Civic RS

91% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Ownership 43
Performance 63
Efficiency 63
Safety 92
Practicality 58
Ownership 43
Leads by 5 points
60
#2

CX-3

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 47
Performance 47
Efficiency 61
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Civic RS +16 Efficiency Civic RS +2 Safety Civic RS +8 Practicality Civic RS +10

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Civic RS

Performance 63/100
Efficiency 63/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 43/100

CX-3

Performance 47/100
Efficiency 61/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Honda Civic RS leads the specification evidence index with 65 pts vs 60 pts for CX-3

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Civic RS leads. However, CX-3 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Civic RS
Civic RS
VS
H6
H6
Civic RS vs H6 →
Civic RS
Civic RS
VS
Corolla
Corolla
Civic RS vs Corolla →
Civic RS
Civic RS
VS
CX-5
CX-5
Civic RS vs CX-5 →
Civic RS
Civic RS
VS
T2
T2
Civic RS vs T2 →
Civic RS
Civic RS
VS
Tucson
Tucson
Civic RS vs Tucson →
Civic RS
Civic RS
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Civic RS vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
H6
H6
CX-3 vs H6 →
CX-3
CX-3
VS
Corolla
Corolla
CX-3 vs Corolla →

Civic RS vs CX-3 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.