Renault Captur vs Mazda CX-60

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Renault Captur in South Africa

Renault Captur

1.3L Turbo Esprit Alpine EDC Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 614,999 ex-showroom
⚡ 113 kW 🔧 270 Nm ⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Mazda CX-60 in South Africa

Mazda CX-60

2.5 Individual Edition Auto AWD Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 902,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 141 kW 🔧 261 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Renault Captur vs Mazda CX-60: the short answer

Captur and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Captur starts ZAR 274,201 cheaper Captur from ZAR 515,999 · CX-60 from ZAR 790,200

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Captur CX-60
Maximum Power Captur113 kW @ 6000 rpm CX-60141 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Captur270 Nm @ 1700 rpm CX-60261 Nm @ 3000 rpm
Engine Size Captur1300 cc CX-602488 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Captur15.2 km/l CX-6013.0 km/l
Ground Clearance Captur169 mm CX-60178.8 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Captur

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

CX-60

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Captur

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

CX-60

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Captur CX-60
Model Introduced Year 2026 2023
Generation Current South Africa Captur range First-generation KH-series Mazda CX-60 on Mazda's Large Product architecture
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Mazda introduced the CX-60 locally in 2023, added the six-cylinder Takumi in 2024 and revised suspension and drivetrain calibration for the 2025 update.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active Active
Segment SUV Premium mid-size SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1365 kg 1470 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Captur CX-60
Length 4239 mm 4745 mm
Width 1797 mm 1890 mm
Height 1575 mm 1687.5 mm
Wheelbase 2639 mm 2870 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 178.8 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 169 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 l 58 l
Boot/Cargo Space 484 l 477 l
Kerb Weight 1365 kg 1470 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1800 kg 2342 kg
Payload Capacity 435 kg 872 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.21 m 5.85 m
Front Headroom 939 mm -
Rear Headroom 908 mm -
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1058 mm
Rear Legroom 930 mm 990 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Captur and CX-60 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Captur 51 vs CX-60 59.

Efficiency index: Captur 59 vs CX-60 51.

Safety-equipment index: Captur 91 vs CX-60 98.

Practicality index: Captur 60 vs CX-60 68.

Ownership-cover index: Captur not separately scored vs CX-60 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

CX-60 leads by 5 points

Captur and CX-60 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 70 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 81% source coverage
70
#1 Evidence leader

CX-60

81% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 98
Practicality 68
Leads by 5 points
65
#2

Captur

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 59
Safety 91
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance CX-60 +8 Efficiency Captur +8 Safety CX-60 +7 Practicality CX-60 +8

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

CX-60

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 68/100

Captur

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda CX-60 leads the specification evidence index with 70 pts vs 65 pts for Captur

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, CX-60 leads. However, Captur may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Captur
Captur
VS
H7
H7
Captur vs H7 →
Captur
Captur
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
Captur vs T-Roc →
Captur
Captur
VS
Sportage
Sportage
Captur vs Sportage →
Captur
Captur
VS
03T
03T
Captur vs 03T →
Captur
Captur
VS
SEALION 6 DM-i
SEALION 6 DM-i
Captur vs SEALION 6 DM-i →
Captur
Captur
VS
Tiguan
Tiguan
Captur vs Tiguan →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
H7
H7
CX-60 vs H7 →
CX-60
CX-60
VS
T-Roc
T-Roc
CX-60 vs T-Roc →

Captur vs CX-60 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.