Volkswagen Caddy vs Rolls-Royce Phantom Extended

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Volkswagen Caddy in South Africa

Volkswagen Caddy

Caddy Maxi 2.0 TDI Manual Diesel 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 722,650 ex-showroom
⚡ 81 kW 🔧 300 Nm ⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Rolls-Royce Phantom Extended in South Africa

Rolls-Royce Phantom Extended

Phantom Extended Series II Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
Price on request
⚡ 420 kW 🔧 900 Nm ⛽ 6.21 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Volkswagen Caddy vs Rolls-Royce Phantom Extended: the short answer

Phantom Extended has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Caddy remains close.

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Caddy Phantom Extended
Maximum Power Caddy81 kW Phantom Extended420 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque Caddy300 Nm Phantom Extended900 Nm @ 1700 rpm
Engine Size Caddy1968 cc Phantom Extended6749 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Caddy18.2 km/l Phantom Extended6.21 km/l
Ground Clearance Caddy144 mm Phantom Extended136 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Volkswagen Caddy

Caddy Maxi 2.0 TDI Manual

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Rolls-Royce Phantom Extended

Phantom Extended Series II

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Caddy

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Phantom Extended

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Caddy

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Phantom Extended

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Caddy Phantom Extended
Model Introduced Year 2021 -
Generation SA5 fifth generation on MQB platform – major improvement over previous generation Eighth-generation Phantom Extended in long-wheelbase Series II form
Facelift History Fifth generation launched in SA in 2021 – completely new platform and design The eighth-generation Phantom Extended was presented globally in 2017 and received its light-touch Series II evolution in 2022; its exact South African introduction year remains unverified
Facelift Launched Since 2021 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Van Extended-wheelbase four-door luxury saloon
Color Note White, Silver, Black -
Dealer Stock Note Top grade in the South Africa lineup -
Drivetrain Note 4x2 configuration for the local line-up -
Model Year Current 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Van Extended-wheelbase full-size super-luxury saloon
Tare Mass Kg 1707 kg -
Vehicle Type Van Internal-combustion passenger car
Spec Caddy Phantom Extended
Length 4853 mm 5982 mm
Width 1855 mm 2018 mm
Height 1823 mm 1656 mm
Wheelbase 2970 mm 3772 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 144 mm 136 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 90 l
Boot/Cargo Space 446 l 530 l
Kerb Weight 1707 kg 2610 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2250 kg 3295 kg
Payload Capacity 543 kg 685 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 12.1 m 6.9 m
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) - 136 mm
Number of Rows - 2 rows
Front Headroom - 1046.48 mm
Rear Headroom - 977.9 mm
Front Legroom - 1041.4 mm
Rear Legroom - 1348.74 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Caddy and Phantom Extended comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Caddy 44 vs Phantom Extended 96.

Efficiency index: Caddy 72 vs Phantom Extended 29.

Safety-equipment index: Caddy 88 vs Phantom Extended 95.

Practicality index: Caddy 66 vs Phantom Extended 67.

Ownership-cover index: Caddy not separately scored vs Phantom Extended not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Phantom Extended leads by 8 points

Phantom Extended has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Caddy remains close.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 79% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

Phantom Extended

79% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 29
Performance 96
Efficiency 29
Safety 95
Practicality 67
Leads by 8 points
67
#2

Caddy

55% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 44
Performance 44
Efficiency 72
Safety 88
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Phantom Extended +52 Efficiency Caddy +43 Safety Phantom Extended +7 Practicality Phantom Extended +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Phantom Extended

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 29/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 67/100

Caddy

Performance 44/100
Efficiency 72/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Rolls-Royce Phantom Extended leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 67 pts for Caddy

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Phantom Extended leads. However, Caddy may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Caddy vs Phantom Extended questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.