Omoda C5 vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Omoda C5 in South Africa

Omoda C5

Street Plus Petrol 6-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 339,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV in South Africa

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV

PHEV Apex Plug-in Hybrid Current
ZAR 729,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C5 vs Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV: the short answer

Tiggo 8 PHEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while C5 remains close.

C5 starts ZAR 390,000 cheaper C5 from ZAR 339,900 · Tiggo 8 PHEV from ZAR 729,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C5 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Maximum Power C5115 kW @ 5500 rpm Tiggo 8 PHEV150 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque C5230 Nm Tiggo 8 PHEV230 Nm
Engine Size C51500 cc Tiggo 8 PHEV1500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C514.5 km/l Tiggo 8 PHEV19.2 km/l
Ground Clearance C5169 mm Tiggo 8 PHEV170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Tiggo 8 PHEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C5 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Model Introduced Year 2023 2026
Generation Current South Africa C5 range Current South Africa Tiggo 8 PHEV range
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Current South Africa version listed by official source
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1381 kg 1907 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec C5 Tiggo 8 PHEV
Length 4400 mm 4725 mm
Width 1830 mm 1860 mm
Height 1590 mm 1705 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 2710 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 145 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 442 l 494 l
Kerb Weight 1381 kg 1907 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1856 kg 2430 kg
Payload Capacity 475 kg 523 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1020 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 985 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1055 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 945 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C5 and Tiggo 8 PHEV comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 51 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 56.

Efficiency index: C5 56 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 81.

Safety-equipment index: C5 91 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 94.

Practicality index: C5 59 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV 70.

Ownership-cover index: C5 not separately scored vs Tiggo 8 PHEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tiggo 8 PHEV leads by 10 points

Tiggo 8 PHEV has a modest catalogue-index lead, while C5 remains close.

Evidence leader 74 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 69% source coverage
74
#1 Evidence leader

Tiggo 8 PHEV

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 56
Performance 56
Efficiency 81
Safety 94
Practicality 70
Leads by 10 points
64
#2

C5

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 59
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tiggo 8 PHEV +5 Efficiency Tiggo 8 PHEV +25 Safety Tiggo 8 PHEV +3 Practicality Tiggo 8 PHEV +11

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tiggo 8 PHEV

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 81/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 70/100

C5

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 59/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV leads the specification evidence index with 74 pts vs 64 pts for C5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tiggo 8 PHEV leads. However, C5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

C5 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.