Omoda C5 vs GWM Tank 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Omoda C5 in South Africa

Omoda C5

Street Plus Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 339,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 115 kW 🔧 230 Nm ⛽ 14.5 km/l
VS
GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Plug-in Hybrid 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 35.7 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Tank 300
Fuel Economy Tank 300
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
C5 starts ZAR 360,000 cheaper C5 from ZAR 339,900 · Tank 300 from ZAR 699,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec C5 Tank 300
Maximum Power 115 kW @ 5500 rpm 240 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 230 Nm 750 Nm
Engine Size 1500 cc 1999 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 14.5 km/l 35.7 km/l
Ground Clearance 169 mm 224 mm
Boot / Load Bay 442 l 490 l
Airbags Multiple airbags 8
Kerb Weight 1381 kg 2050 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 Years / 150 000 km 5 Years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tank 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over C5.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +49 pts
Efficiency Tank 300 +41 pts
Safety Tank 300 +9 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +10 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C5

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Catalogue-index leader

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C5

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Tank 300

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C5 Tank 300
Model Introduced Year 2023 2024
Generation Current South Africa C5 range First generation, launched globally in 2021 and brought to South Africa in 2024. The Tank brand is positioned as GWM's premium off-road sub-brand alongside Haval (SUVs) and Ora (electric).
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source First-generation Tank 300 launched in South Africa in 2024. No significant facelift to date; software updates have refined the differential locking activation logic and refined the hybrid system on the Hi4-T variant.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active published
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1381 kg 2050 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Color Note - Crystal White, Hamilton Black, Mars Red, Atlantic Blue, Adventure Olive Green and Sand Dune Beige. The Adventure Olive Green is exclusive to Off-Road and Hi4-T Hybrid trims.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec C5 Tank 300
Length 4400 mm 4638 mm
Width 1830 mm 1926 mm
Height 1590 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 2750 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 169 mm 224 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 442 l 490 l
Kerb Weight 1381 kg 2050 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1875 kg 2200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Towing Capacity - 2500 kg
Minimum Turning Radius - 12.4 m
Front Headroom - 990 mm
Rear Headroom - 960 mm
Front Legroom - 1050 mm
Rear Legroom - 890 mm

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Tank 300 leads by 22 points

Tank 300 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over C5.

Index leader 88 /100
Lead 22 points
Data 96% source coverage
88
#1 Index leader

Tank 300

96% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 98
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 22 points
66
#2

C5

58% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 91 Check Performance 49
Performance 49
Efficiency 56
Safety 91
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +49 Efficiency Tank 300 +41 Safety Tank 300 +9 Practicality Tank 300 +10

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Tank 300

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

C5

Performance 49/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 91/100
Practicality 66/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 GWM Tank 300 leads the catalogue index with 88 pts vs 66 pts for C5

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Tank 300 leads. However, C5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This C5 and Tank 300 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 49 vs Tank 300 98.

Efficiency index: C5 56 vs Tank 300 97.

Safety-equipment index: C5 91 vs Tank 300 100.

Practicality index: C5 66 vs Tank 300 76.

Ownership-cover index: C5 not separately scored vs Tank 300 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.