Leapmotor C10 REEV vs GWM Tank 300

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Leapmotor C10 REEV in South Africa

Leapmotor C10 REEV

Design Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 799,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 158 kW 🔧 320 Nm
VS
GWM Tank 300 in South Africa

GWM Tank 300

2.0T Hi4-T Hybrid Hybrid Automatic
ZAR 849,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 240 kW 🔧 750 Nm ⛽ 35.7 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

⚡ Performance Tank 300
⛽ Fuel Economy C10 REEV
🛡 Safety Tank 300
📦 Practicality Tank 300
🔑 Ownership Tank 300
Tank 300 starts ZAR 759900 cheaper C10 REEV from ZAR 759,900 · Tank 300 from ZAR 699,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec C10 REEV Tank 300
Engine Power 158 kW 240 kW
Torque 320 Nm 750 Nm
Engine Size 1.5 l 1999 cc
Claimed Mileage 333.3 35.7 km/l
Ground Clearance 180 mm 224 mm
Boot / Load Bay 400 l 490 l
Airbags 7 8
Kerb Weight 1950 kg 2050 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Warranty 5 years / 100,000 km 5 Years / 100,000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Tank 300 has a slight advantage, but C10 REEV remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Tank 300 +17 pts
Efficiency C10 REEV +3 pts
Safety Tank 300 +1 pts
Practicality Tank 300 +11 pts
Ownership Tank 300 +10 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C10 REEV

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

Tank 300

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

C10 REEV

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Tank 300

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C10 REEV Tank 300
Model Introduced Year 2025 2024
Generation First-generation Leapmotor C10 range-extended electric SUV First generation, launched globally in 2021 and brought to South Africa in 2024. The Tank brand is positioned as GWM's premium off-road sub-brand alongside Haval (SUVs) and Ora (electric).
Facelift History The C10 REEV launched in South Africa in October 2025 as Leapmotor's first local model. First-generation Tank 300 launched in South Africa in 2024. No significant facelift to date; software updates have refined the differential locking activation logic and refined the hybrid system on the Hi4-T variant.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2024
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active published
Segment D-segment family SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Color Note - Crystal White, Hamilton Black, Mars Red, Atlantic Blue, Adventure Olive Green and Sand Dune Beige. The Adventure Olive Green is exclusive to Off-Road and Hi4-T Hybrid trims.
Spec C10 REEV Tank 300
Ground Clearance 180 mm 224 mm
Wheelbase 2825 mm 2750 mm
Length 4739 mm 4638 mm
Width 1900 mm 1926 mm
Height 1680 mm 1850 mm
Kerb Weight 1950 kg 2050 kg
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 400 l 490 l
Turning Radius 5.6 m 12.4 m
Load Bed Length 400 l 490 l
Load Bed Width - -
Boot Space Seats Folded 1375 l 690 l
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Volume 400 l 490 l
Doors 5 5
Seats 5 5
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 l 65 l
Ground Clearance Max 180 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance Min 180 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance Mm 180 mm 224 mm
Height Mm 1680 mm 1850 mm
Length Mm 4739 mm 4638 mm
Loadbox Length Mm 400 l 490 l
Loadbox Width Mm - -
Cargo Volume 400 l 490 l
Tare Mass Kg 1950 kg 2050 kg
Turning Circle 5.6 m 12.4 m
Turning Circle M 5.6 m 12.4 m
Width Mm 1900 mm 1926 mm
Front Overhang - 880 mm
Front Track Width - 1560 mm
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg - 2200 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight - 2200 kg
Front Headroom - 990 mm
Rear Headroom - 960 mm
Front Legroom - 1050 mm
Rear Legroom - 890 mm
Rear Overhang - 890 mm
Rear Track Width - 1570 mm
Front Shoulder Room - 1430 mm
Rear Shoulder Room - 1390 mm
Towing Capacity - 2500 kg
Tracking System - Optional
Boot Space Seats Folded 1375 l 690 l
Max Payload - -
Payload Kg - -

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Tank 300 leads by 8 points

Tank 300 has a slight advantage, but C10 REEV remains highly competitive.

Winner 85 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 97% confidence
85
#1 Winner

Tank 300

97% data confidence 4 strong categories
Best at Safety 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 82
Efficiency 97
Safety 100
Practicality 76
Ownership 65
Leads by 8 points
77
#2

C10 REEV

87% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 100 Check Ownership 55
Performance 65
Efficiency 100
Safety 99
Practicality 65
Ownership 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tank 300 +17 Efficiency C10 REEV +3 Safety Tank 300 +1 Practicality Tank 300 +11 Ownership Tank 300 +10

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Tank 300

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 97/100
Safety 100/100
Practicality 76/100
Ownership 65/100

C10 REEV

Performance 65/100
Efficiency 100/100
Safety 99/100
Practicality 65/100
Ownership 55/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Tank 300 wins with 85 pts vs 77 pts for C10 REEV

In structured scoring, Tank 300 emerges as the stronger overall package. However, C10 REEV may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Other Comparisons Worth Checking

See how similar cars go head-to-head — you might find a better fit than you expected.

C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
C10 REEV vs Land Cruiser FJ →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
MU-X
MU-X
C10 REEV vs MU-X →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
H6 PHEV
H6 PHEV
C10 REEV vs H6 PHEV →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
H6 GT
H6 GT
C10 REEV vs H6 GT →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
J7 SHS
J7 SHS
C10 REEV vs J7 SHS →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tiggo 8 PHEV
Tank 300 vs Tiggo 8 PHEV →
Tank 300
Tank 300
VS
Land Cruiser FJ
Land Cruiser FJ
Tank 300 vs Land Cruiser FJ →

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross
Tiggo 4 Cross
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 4 Cross →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
Tiggo 4 Cross HEV
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 4 Cross HEV →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 4 Pro
Tiggo 4 Pro
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 4 Pro →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 7
Tiggo 7
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 7 →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
C10 REEV
C10 REEV
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
C10 REEV vs Tiggo 7 Pro →

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Tank 300 edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: C10 REEV 100 vs Tank 300 97. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: C10 REEV 99, Tank 300 100. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: C10 REEV 55, Tank 300 65. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: C10 REEV 65, Tank 300 76. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: C10 REEV 65, Tank 300 82. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Tank 300 edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Tank 300 scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between C10 REEV and Tank 300 in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: C10 REEV scores 65 vs 82.

Efficiency: C10 REEV scores 100 vs 97.

Safety: C10 REEV scores 99 vs 100.

Practicality: C10 REEV scores 65 vs 76.

Ownership: C10 REEV scores 55 vs 65.

Final structured scoring gives Tank 300 the advantage in this comparison.