Toyota C-HR vs BMW iX1

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
BMW iX1 in South Africa

BMW iX1

xDrive30 M Sport Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,255,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 230 kW 🔧 494 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota C-HR vs BMW iX1: the short answer

iX1 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over C-HR.

Recorded price context C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000 · iX1: current from ZAR 1,210,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C-HR iX1
Maximum Power C-HR134 kW iX1230 kW
Maximum Torque C-HR190 Nm iX1494 Nm
Engine Size C-HR1987 cc iX1Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy C-HR19.2 km/l iX1Not Applicable
Ground Clearance C-HR160 mm iX1190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C-HR

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

iX1

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

iX1

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C-HR iX1
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA Battery-electric U11 compact SUV, closely related in body and cabin architecture to the third-generation X1.
Facelift History All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023 The current U11 iX1 is the first battery-electric X1 generation; no South African facelift has been announced.
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Model Year 2021 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment SUV Premium SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1500 kg -
Vehicle Type 5-door Crossover SUV Car
Spec C-HR iX1
Length 4390 mm 4500 mm
Width 1796 mm 1845 mm
Height 1550 mm 1616 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 2692 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 43 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 377 l 490 l
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 2085 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1930 kg 2580 kg
Payload Capacity 430 kg 570 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 1 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.8 m
Front Headroom 993 mm 1020 mm
Rear Headroom 946 mm 981 mm
Front Legroom 1030 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 881 mm 928 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C-HR and iX1 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-HR 53 vs iX1 95.

Efficiency index: C-HR 78 vs iX1 90.

Safety-equipment index: C-HR 98 vs iX1 92.

Practicality index: C-HR 57 vs iX1 64.

Ownership-cover index: C-HR 43 vs iX1 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

iX1 leads by 18 points

iX1 holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over C-HR.

Evidence leader 85 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 69% source coverage
85
#1 Evidence leader

iX1

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 95 Check Practicality 64
Performance 95
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 64
Leads by 18 points
67
#2

C-HR

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance iX1 +42 Efficiency iX1 +12 Safety C-HR +6 Practicality iX1 +7

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

iX1

Performance 95/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 64/100

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index BMW iX1 leads the specification evidence index with 85 pts vs 67 pts for C-HR

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, iX1 leads. However, C-HR may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Everest
Everest
C-HR vs Everest →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
X1
X1
C-HR vs X1 →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
H6 GT PHEV
H6 GT PHEV
C-HR vs H6 GT PHEV →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Tiggo 9 PHEV
Tiggo 9 PHEV
C-HR vs Tiggo 9 PHEV →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Tayron
Tayron
C-HR vs Tayron →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
CX-60
CX-60
C-HR vs CX-60 →
iX1
iX1
VS
Everest
Everest
iX1 vs Everest →
iX1
iX1
VS
X1
X1
iX1 vs X1 →

C-HR vs iX1 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.