Dongfeng BOX vs Lexus LX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Dongfeng BOX in South Africa

Dongfeng BOX

BOX E3 430 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 70 kW 🔧 160 Nm ⛽ 0 km/l
VS
Lexus LX in South Africa

Lexus LX

LX 500d F SPORT Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 2,687,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW 🔧 700 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng BOX vs Lexus LX: the short answer

LX has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over BOX.

BOX starts ZAR 2,287,600 cheaper BOX from ZAR 399,900 · LX from ZAR 2,687,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification BOX LX
Maximum Power BOX70 kW LX225 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque BOX160 Nm LX700 Nm
Engine Size BOXNot Applicable LX3300 cc
Combined Fuel Economy BOX0 km/l LX11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance BOX0 mm LX205 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Dongfeng BOX

BOX E3 430

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Lexus LX

LX 500d F SPORT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

BOX

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

LX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

BOX

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

LX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec BOX LX
Model Introduced Year 2026 2022
Generation Current South African generation Fourth-generation Lexus LX flagship body-on-frame SUV
Facelift History Current launch specification Current range adds LX 700h hybrid and Overtrail grades while retaining LX 500d diesel choices
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Current range adds LX 700h hybrid and Overtrail grades while retaining LX 500d diesel choices
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style Hatchback SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active published
Segment Electric city hatchback Luxury SUV
Vehicle Type Hatchback SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 2670 kg
Spec BOX LX
Length 4020 mm 5090 mm
Width 1810 mm 1990 mm
Height 1570 mm 1895 mm
Wheelbase 2663 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 205 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 140 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 110 l
Boot/Cargo Space 326 l 1109 l
Kerb Weight 1370 kg 2670 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1820 kg 3280 kg
Payload Capacity 450 kg 610 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 6 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm -
Rear Headroom 950 mm -
Front Legroom 1050 mm -
Rear Legroom 900 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This BOX and LX comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: BOX 36 vs LX 98.

Efficiency index: BOX 90 vs LX 47.

Safety-equipment index: BOX 70 vs LX 93.

Practicality index: BOX 47 vs LX 84.

Ownership-cover index: BOX not separately scored vs LX not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

LX leads by 25 points

LX has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over BOX.

Evidence leader 83 /100
Lead 25 points
Data 69% source coverage
83
#1 Evidence leader

LX

69% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 47
Performance 98
Efficiency 47
Safety 93
Practicality 84
Leads by 25 points
58
#2

BOX

64% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 90 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 90
Safety 70
Practicality 47
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance LX +62 Efficiency BOX +43 Safety LX +23 Practicality LX +37

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

LX

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 47/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 84/100

BOX

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 70/100
Practicality 47/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus LX leads the specification evidence index with 83 pts vs 58 pts for BOX

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, LX leads. However, BOX may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

BOX
BOX
VS
RX
RX
BOX vs RX →
BOX
BOX
VS
Touareg
Touareg
BOX vs Touareg →
BOX
BOX
VS
GLC Coupé
GLC Coupé
BOX vs GLC Coupé →
BOX
BOX
VS
RZ
RZ
BOX vs RZ →
BOX
BOX
VS
iX2
iX2
BOX vs iX2 →
BOX
BOX
VS
X5
X5
BOX vs X5 →
LX
LX
VS
RX
RX
LX vs RX →
LX
LX
VS
Touareg
Touareg
LX vs Touareg →

BOX vs LX questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.