Mahindra Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs GWM P500

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mahindra Bolero MaXX Pik-Up in South Africa

Mahindra Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

1.7T HD Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 259,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 60 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ 17.2 km/l
VS
GWM P500 in South Africa

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT Hybrid 9-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 255 kW 🔧 648 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mahindra Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs GWM P500: the short answer

P500 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Bolero MaXX Pik-Up remains close.

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up starts ZAR 600,900 cheaper Bolero MaXX Pik-Up from ZAR 199,000 · P500 from ZAR 799,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Bolero MaXX Pik-Up P500
Maximum Power Bolero MaXX Pik-Up60 kW @ 3200 rpm P500255 kW
Maximum Torque Bolero MaXX Pik-Up220 Nm @ 1400-2200 rpm P500648 Nm
Engine Size Bolero MaXX Pik-Up2523 cc P5002000 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Bolero MaXX Pik-Up17.2 km/l P50010.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Bolero MaXX Pik-Up200 mm P500224 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Mahindra Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

1.7T HD

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

GWM P500

2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

P500

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance

Which One's Right for You?

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

P500

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Bolero MaXX Pik-Up P500
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation First South African Bolero MaXX Pik-Up range, launched on 11 August 2026 as a model line distinct from the earlier Bolero Maxitruck Current South African P500 listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History New South African model line; not a facelift of the historical Bolero Maxitruck record Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Pickup Double-cab pickup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Active published
Segment Commercial Pickup Pickup
Vehicle Type Pickup Pickup
Body Type Cab - Pickup
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 2.0T HEV Ultra Luxury 4x4 9HAT
Tare Mass Kg - 2761 kg
Spec Bolero MaXX Pik-Up P500
Length 5345 mm 5445 mm
Width 1800 mm 1991 mm
Height 1895 mm 1924 mm
Wheelbase 3290 mm 3350 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 200 mm 224 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 175 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 3569 l 450 l
Kerb Weight 1780 kg 2810 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3480 kg 3495 kg
Payload Capacity 1700 kg 685 kg
Towing Capacity 0 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 7.0 m 6.0 m
Front Headroom 1025 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Applicable 960 mm
Front Legroom 1010 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom Not Applicable 900 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Bolero MaXX Pik-Up and P500 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Bolero MaXX Pik-Up 38 vs P500 98.

Efficiency index: Bolero MaXX Pik-Up 69 vs P500 50.

Safety-equipment index: Bolero MaXX Pik-Up 88 vs P500 88.

Practicality index: Bolero MaXX Pik-Up 78 vs P500 78.

Ownership-cover index: Bolero MaXX Pik-Up not separately scored vs P500 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

P500 leads by 11 points

P500 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Bolero MaXX Pik-Up remains close.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 73% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

P500

73% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 50
Performance 98
Efficiency 50
Safety 88
Practicality 78
Ownership 65
Leads by 11 points
67
#2

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

54% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 38
Performance 38
Efficiency 69
Safety 88
Practicality 78
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance P500 +60 Efficiency Bolero MaXX Pik-Up +19 Safety Level Practicality Level

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

P500

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 78/100
Ownership 65/100

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

Performance 38/100
Efficiency 69/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 78/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index GWM P500 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 67 pts for Bolero MaXX Pik-Up

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, P500 leads. However, Bolero MaXX Pik-Up may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
VS
Triton Single Cab
Triton Single Cab
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs Triton Single Cab →
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
VS
S4 Game Viewer
S4 Game Viewer
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs S4 Game Viewer →
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
VS
Navara Double Cab
Navara Double Cab
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs Navara Double Cab →
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
VS
T60 Double Cab
T60 Double Cab
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs T60 Double Cab →
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
VS
S6 Mining
S6 Mining
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs S6 Mining →
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up
VS
D-Max Extended Cab
D-Max Extended Cab
Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs D-Max Extended Cab →
P500
P500
VS
Triton Single Cab
Triton Single Cab
P500 vs Triton Single Cab →
P500
P500
VS
S4 Game Viewer
S4 Game Viewer
P500 vs S4 Game Viewer →

Bolero MaXX Pik-Up vs P500 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.