Suzuki Baleno vs Ford Transit Custom

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Baleno in South Africa

Suzuki Baleno

1.5 GLX AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 341,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
VS
Ford Transit Custom in South Africa

Ford Transit Custom

2.0L LWB Van Base 6MT Diesel 6-Speed Manual Current
ZAR 770,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 100 kW 🔧 360 Nm ⛽ 12.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Baleno vs Ford Transit Custom: the short answer

Transit Custom has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Baleno remains close.

Baleno starts ZAR 500,100 cheaper Baleno from ZAR 269,900 · Transit Custom from ZAR 770,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Baleno Transit Custom
Maximum Power Baleno77 kW Transit Custom100 kW
Maximum Torque Baleno138 Nm Transit Custom360 Nm
Engine Size Baleno1462 cc Transit Custom1996 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Baleno16.1 km/l Transit Custom12.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Baleno0 mm Transit Custom130 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Suzuki Baleno

1.5 GLX AT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Ford Transit Custom

2.0L LWB Van Base 6MT

Hagalu editorial rating
4.2/5

Desk research · Exact variant

Hagalu Editorial Team ·

Editorial assessment, not a customer rating. Not road-tested for this review.

Read the review and score breakdown

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Baleno

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

Transit Custom

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Baleno

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Transit Custom

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Baleno Transit Custom
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current market generation Current South African Transit Custom listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Current market specification Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback Van
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Hatchback Commercial van
Vehicle Type Hatchback Van
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Base grade in the South Africa lineup
Wheelbase Type - Long wheelbase
Tare Mass Kg - 1756 kg
Spec Baleno Transit Custom
Length 3990 mm 5450 mm
Width 1745 mm 2032 mm
Height 1500 mm 1979 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 3500 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 130 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 50 l
Boot/Cargo Space 318 l 484 l
Kerb Weight 940 kg 1756 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1700 kg 3025 kg
Payload Capacity 760 kg 1269 kg
Towing Capacity 500 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.2 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 984 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm 947 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1047 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 881 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Baleno and Transit Custom comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Baleno 34 vs Transit Custom 60.

Efficiency index: Baleno 62 vs Transit Custom 53.

Safety-equipment index: Baleno 87 vs Transit Custom 90.

Practicality index: Baleno 50 vs Transit Custom 61.

Ownership-cover index: Baleno not separately scored vs Transit Custom not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Transit Custom leads by 10 points

Transit Custom has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Baleno remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 65% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Transit Custom

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 90 Check Efficiency 53
Performance 60
Efficiency 53
Safety 90
Practicality 61
Leads by 10 points
57
#2

Baleno

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 62
Safety 87
Practicality 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Transit Custom +26 Efficiency Baleno +9 Safety Transit Custom +3 Practicality Transit Custom +11

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Transit Custom

Performance 60/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 90/100
Practicality 61/100

Baleno

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 50/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Ford Transit Custom leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 57 pts for Baleno

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Transit Custom leads. However, Baleno may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

Baleno
Baleno
VS
Corolla Hatch
Corolla Hatch
Baleno vs Corolla Hatch →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
Baleno vs DOLPHIN →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
Mazda3
Mazda3
Baleno vs Mazda3 →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
Hiace Ses'fikile
Hiace Ses'fikile
Baleno vs Hiace Ses'fikile →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
G10+ Van
G10+ Van
Baleno vs G10+ Van →
Baleno
Baleno
VS
Swift Sport
Swift Sport
Baleno vs Swift Sport →
Transit Custom
Transit Custom
VS
Corolla Hatch
Corolla Hatch
Transit Custom vs Corolla Hatch →
Transit Custom
Transit Custom
VS
DOLPHIN
DOLPHIN
Transit Custom vs DOLPHIN →

Baleno vs Transit Custom questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.